Search for: "Degree v. United States"
Results 4781 - 4800
of 6,532
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Dec 2023, 5:19 am
Ltd. v Shanghai Yingxun Technology Co. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 6:00 am
Or as Marshall put it in 1800: “[T]he people of the United States have no jurisdiction over offenses committed on board a foreign ship against a foreign nation. [read post]
22 Dec 2023, 5:19 am
Ltd. v Shanghai Yingxun Technology Co. [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 2:50 am
.; Case No. 894-81580-reg, Chapter 7, Case No. 809-8452-reg;UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK;2011 Bankr. [read post]
26 Jul 2014, 10:00 pm
But with the case of the United States v. [read post]
11 Aug 2022, 8:26 am
., Ltd v The NOCO Company, a case on battery-powered car jump starters. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 8:35 am
Such conduct contradicted the appellant’s stated desire for a speedy disposition of his case.Finally, the fourth factor focuses on the degree of prejudice that the appellant suffered as a result of the delay. [read post]
17 May 2011, 11:46 am
In United States v. [read post]
18 Jun 2019, 6:00 am
The attorney-client privilege is a long-established principle in the United States (and generally in all of the Western world as well), recognized under English common law since at least 1576 (Berd v. [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 2:15 pm
Mitchell, No. 02-3505 Denial of a petition for habeas relief in a death penalty case is reversed where: 1) a state court applied the Strickland standard in an objectively unreasonable manner for purposes of claims that petitioner's counsel were ineffective in preparing for the sentencing phase of his trial; 2) the state court unreasonably determined that the alleged errors of trial counsel did not prejudice petitioner's case; and 3) a state court erroneously… [read post]
8 Oct 2021, 2:31 pm
Zana v. [read post]
31 Mar 2017, 3:37 pm
Banning Ranch Conservancy v. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 10:27 am
In particular, because of the Supreme Court’s recent opinion in AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
30 Nov 2008, 4:24 pm
Specifically, he claimed that those counts did not sufficiently allege statutory aggravating factors, as required by Ring v. [read post]
19 Dec 2009, 11:42 am
 Obama and the Democrats would deliver the United States. [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 9:01 pm
Said and United States v. [read post]
27 Sep 2024, 6:05 am
Israel and Nicaragua v. [read post]
5 Aug 2022, 5:01 am
Despite all that, thanks to a sea change in the economy, the Court’s decision may have only a minor impact on efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions in the United States. [read post]
1 Oct 2021, 4:00 am
“Not since Bush v. [read post]
11 Mar 2016, 3:08 pm
If dissatisfied with a refusal, an applicant can appeal the decision to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (“TTAB” or “Board”) of the United States Patent & Trademark Office (“USPTO”). [read post]
