Search for: "Doe v. Superior Court" Results 4781 - 4800 of 8,636
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Aug 2013, 5:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
Superior Court (2007) 42 Cal.4th 443 with respect to contractual class action waivers in the context of non-waivable labor law rights? [read post]
19 Aug 2013, 8:33 am by Linda A. Kerns
 While the statue lists the factors, the trial judge has the freedom to decide which factors are more important, and which factors are less important, in each individual case.Courts must consider the statutory factors when considering a relocation petition.The Superior Court (our appellate court) just affirmed (agreed with) the ruling of the trial court in Erie County, Pennsylvania denying a mother the opportunity to relocate from Erie County to Bucks County… [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 8:10 am
   From this general study, it is then possible to begin to focus more particularly on the interpretation and application of law, focusing on the role of the courts and their frameworks for statutory and constitutional interpretation. [read post]
13 Aug 2013, 9:30 am by Devlin Hartline
Staying with the context of antitrust law, take the example of FTC v. [read post]
13 Aug 2013, 3:50 am by Andrew Trask
But, more instructively, the court also held that individual lawsuits were superior to the proposed class action. [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 7:56 am by Joy Waltemath
Title VII “does not create a privilege to misbehave in mediation,” the court concluded. [read post]
11 Aug 2013, 8:00 pm by Keri Bennett
Pursuant to the Ontario Court of Appeal’s decision in Wronko v. [read post]
10 Aug 2013, 2:37 pm by Stephen Bilkis
For the reasons that follow this court finds that they may not and the indictment must be dismissed—the law is well settled that a joint or common owner of property cannot steal from another joint or common owner of that property as the victim of the "theft" does not have a superior right of possession, a required element of larceny. [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 5:03 am by Susan Brenner
White, 781 A.2d 85 (New Jersey Superior Court 2001)). [read post]
8 Aug 2013, 9:28 am
The court of appeals held that the Supreme Court rejected the "due diligence" exception to Brady in Banks v. [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 8:32 am
James Franco's 'Alien v Riff Raff In order to enforce his right of publicity successfully in the US (this is a right which does not exist in the UK, as explained in the case of Rihanna)- a plaintiff must demonstrate the following criteria established in Eastwood v Superior Court (California Court of Appeal, 1983):     (1)   Defendant’s use of Plaintiff’s identity    … [read post]
4 Aug 2013, 7:16 am by Omar Ha-Redeye
The Supreme Court of Canada released the decision in Ontario v. [read post]