Search for: "Figures v. Figures" Results 4781 - 4800 of 15,516
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jun 2023, 6:38 am by Eric Goldman
Even if Rogers does not apply, the Court said that a “trademark’s expressive message—particularly a parodic one, as VIP asserts—may properly figure in assessing the likelihood of confusion. [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 9:30 pm by RegBlog
IN THE NEWS The Supreme Court of the United States heard oral argument in U.S. v. [read post]
5 Nov 2007, 9:52 pm
They need to figure out if it's worth the extra money and psychological toll to move ahead, or if they're better off just making the best of a result to have a case over. [read post]
5 Jul 2009, 4:08 pm
Supreme Court’s Decision in Exxon Shipping Co. v. [read post]
6 Jul 2009, 10:05 am
We have uncovered personal connections (Vivian Hood is married to Darl, my grandmother's name is Vivyenne Darl - go figure), and hidden commonalities (Girl Scouts, anyone??). [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 3:07 pm by Georgialee Lang
Today’s decision from the Supreme Court of Canada in A. v. [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 6:15 am
The state Supreme Court in that recent high-profile case, Abigaile Lebron v. [read post]
15 Oct 2012, 9:20 am by Kenneth B. Weckstein
Some laws are just too confusing to be broken, or so sayeth the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals in United States v. [read post]