Search for: "House v. House"
Results 4781 - 4800
of 41,326
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Oct 2019, 12:33 pm
Emambee v London Borough of Islington (2019) EWHC 2835 (QB) We saw what seemed like a rather harsh refusal on permission to bring a s.204 Housing Act 1996 homelessness appeal out of time in London Borough of Hamlets v Al Ahmed (2019) EWHC 749 (QB) (our note). [read post]
Strauss Charges Texas Legislature to Look at Local Ordinances Governing Surface Use in Barnett Shale
31 Mar 2010, 4:21 pm
Texas Citizens for a Safe Future and Clean Water v. [read post]
4 Aug 2012, 10:11 am
The Attorney General responded that Tracey v. [read post]
23 Oct 2011, 8:36 pm
[Banton]; Egli v. [read post]
1 Mar 2007, 12:51 pm
Gunnery Sergeant Gallagher lived in military housing with his wife and children. [read post]
23 May 2017, 12:18 pm
The Ontario Court of Appeal has now released its decision in the Gilmor v. [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 6:23 am
In Florida v. [read post]
12 Oct 2008, 3:22 pm
State v. [read post]
20 Jul 2017, 8:51 am
Harris, formerly known as McCrory v. [read post]
21 May 2017, 2:42 pm
… review decisions are prepared by housing officers, who occupy a post of considerable responsibility and who have substantial experience in the housing field, but they are not lawyers. [read post]
19 Jul 2009, 10:34 pm
West v. [read post]
29 Aug 2008, 8:09 am
R (Binyan Mohamed) v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs [2008] EWHC 2048 (Admin); [2008] WLR (D) 295 “The principles set out by the House of Lords in Norwich Pharmacal Co v Customs and Excise Commissioners [1974] AC 133 could be applied in novel circumstances to require the Foreign Secretary to disclose information, specific to the claimant and essential to his defence to serious charges which might carry the death penalty, in confidence to… [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 6:22 am
"They meant: now that abortion rights were secure, now that Roe v. [read post]
28 Jul 2013, 4:01 pm
[34] In Leger v. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 3:09 pm
Temur v London Borough of Hackney [2014] EWCA Civ 877 This second appeal to the Court of Appeal from a s.204 Housing Act 1996 appeal raises three important questions. [read post]
16 Feb 2021, 10:58 am
Supreme Court’s decision last year in Bostock v. [read post]
15 Apr 2009, 9:20 pm
They are Gill v. [read post]
4 Jul 2007, 11:20 am
As I noted here on July 1st, the "protective sweep" doctrine, developed for a sweep of houses or rooms to look for others who could pose a threat to the officer (Maryland v. [read post]
28 Sep 2022, 4:30 am
Meredith Render (University of Alabama - School of Law) has posted Blake v. [read post]
19 Oct 2007, 7:04 am
Kyllo v. [read post]
