Search for: "Husband (S) v. Wife (S)" Results 4781 - 4800 of 6,156
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Sep 2010, 8:02 am by admin
Is a wife who waived her rights in a separation agreement entitled to receive ex post facto equitable distribution of husbands military retirement funds in Virginia? [read post]
3 Sep 2010, 11:30 am by Michelle O'Neil
Wife Brooke routinely gave Husband Daniel her paychecks to be deposited in Husband Daniel’s bank account and Husband Daniel gave her money when she needed it. [read post]
29 Aug 2010, 9:16 am by admin
According to the Virginia Circuit Court judge, the wife established that the husbands joint titling of the property signified valid inter vivos gifts to the wife. [read post]
28 Aug 2010, 6:00 am
Thomas, 418 So.2d 316 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982), the wife was awarded 58% of the husband's net income. [read post]
28 Aug 2010, 6:00 am
Thomas, 418 So.2d 316 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982), the wife was awarded 58% of the husband's net income. [read post]
27 Aug 2010, 10:13 am by Adam Wagner
Patel, R (on the application of) v Lord Chancellor [2010] EWHC 2220 (Admin) (27 August 2010) – Read judgment The wife of the purported ringleader of the ’7/7? [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 4:41 am by admin
Can wife claim a homestead exemption in bankruptcy in property titled solely in husbands name because it might be considered marital property under Virginia’s equitable distribution statute? [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 12:39 am by INFORRM
  The Court held that the wife could not use documents which were obtained from her husbands computer in ancillary relief proceedings and disapproved the “Hildebrand” rules. [read post]
24 Aug 2010, 6:02 pm by Robert Thomas (inversecondemnation.com)
  In this divorce case, Recktenwald’s opinion for the court affirmed the family court’s holding that Wife was equitably estopped from denying Husband was the father of one of her children for purposes of determining custody where the amended birth certificate showed Husband and the father and Wife and Husband treated the child as a daughter of Husband. [read post]
24 Aug 2010, 4:16 am by Matthew Hill
In the present case, the Appellants, a husband and wife and their four children, had argued that their value to the community within the UK was a matter that should weigh in their favour when the decision-maker undertook the balancing exercise. [read post]