Search for: "Husband v. Wife" Results 4781 - 4800 of 6,703
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Apr 2011, 1:52 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
  It's all in the minutia of the divorce dollars. in Sevey v Friedlander ;   2011 NY Slip Op 02978 ;Decided on April 14, 2011 ;Appellate Division, Third Department we see that even the purchase of a car by husband is factored into the mix. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 6:31 pm
Wife argued that despite the statutory community presumption per Family Code section 760 that property acquired during marriage belongs to the community, existing caselaw (Raphael v. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 8:42 am
Yerushalmi v Yerushalmi 2011 NY Slip Op 02657 Decided on March 29, 2011 Appellate Division, Second Department The supreme court denied husband’s motion to modify a pendente lite support award to wife, and denied husband’s motion to renew, which husband appealed. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 7:53 am
Mizrachi v Mizrachi 2011 NY Slip Op 02640 Decided on March 29, 2011 Appellate Division, Second Department The Second Department affirmed the supreme court’s judgment equitably distributing the marital residence to wife, awarding her exclusive use and occupancy of the marital home, awarding her child support, and holding husband in civil contempt for willfully violating a pendente lite child [...] [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 7:15 am
Demurrers had been filed to both the injured worker husband's and his wife's causes of actions essentially arguing exclusivity of workers' compensation remedy as to both plaintiffs, and lack of standing as to the wife. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 1:54 pm
Lew v Lew 2011 NY Slip Op 02634 Decided on March 29, 2011 Appellate Division, Second Department Husband appealed from the supreme court judgment in which the court awarded wife child support, childcare expenses, education expenses, and medical expenses. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 1:54 pm
Coven v Coven 2011 NY Slip Op 02618 Decided on March 29, 2011 Appellate Division, Second Department Wife asked for $25,000 in interim counsel fees, but the supreme court only awarded her $10,000. [read post]
14 Apr 2011, 2:12 pm
” Self Defence and Duress Defence Self Defence More than 20 years ago the Supreme Court of Canada ruled in R. v. [read post]
14 Apr 2011, 8:39 am by WSLL
Nevertheless, unless requested, district courts are not required to make specific findings for each statutory factor if consideration is reflected in the proceeding transcripts, by opinion letter, or as findings in the written order.In the present action, although the trial court considered the wife’s role as a primary caregiver in determining what was in the best interests of the child, the other factors which were considered by the trial court ultimately weighed in the… [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 6:18 am by Adam Chandler
The mock trial was based on Oscar Wilde’s play An Ideal Husband. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 5:56 am by Susan Brenner
Moreover, a husband who calls a repair shop for his wife, without her `prior express permission,’ to see if her car is ready, what was wrong, and how much the repair bill is, would be seeking information in violation of the statute. [read post]