Search for: "In re Faith S."
Results 4781 - 4800
of 11,706
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Aug 2016, 9:30 pm
The book recommendation was James Scott’s Seeing Like a State.Session II. [read post]
3 Aug 2016, 5:16 am
”) In re T.S., 2015-Ohio-1184 (3rd Dist.) [read post]
1 Aug 2016, 3:20 pm
I think it’s because they’re just so far-fetched, that it’s difficult for me to buy into the premise. [read post]
1 Aug 2016, 3:20 pm
I think it’s because they’re just so far-fetched, that it’s difficult for me to buy into the premise. [read post]
1 Aug 2016, 1:26 pm
But at least these arguments are sound in traditional exigent circumstances analysis, so they’re pretty fact-bound points. [read post]
30 Jul 2016, 10:37 am
And the Town’s suggested “bad faith” standard is unworkable. [read post]
26 Jul 2016, 9:01 pm
For example, when FBI crime statistics were cited to debunk Trump’s claims that we are re-living the crime wave of the 1960s-1990s, his campaign manager questioned the FBI’s credibility because its director, James Comey, failed to recommend that Hillary Clinton be prosecuted for her use of a private email server while Secretary of State. [read post]
26 Jul 2016, 1:48 pm
” No. 2: It is not “religious harassment” to wear clothing or jewelry at work that relates to one’s faith. [read post]
26 Jul 2016, 1:11 pm
Nevin, I take every motion filed in good faith. [read post]
26 Jul 2016, 12:20 pm
In the case that a practitioner mistakenly or wrongly determines that all the conditions are fulfilled and their belief was reasonable and rooted in good faith, they will not be held criminally liable. [read post]
26 Jul 2016, 8:12 am
The substitution hypothesis is taken as a matter of faith, but there's surprisingly little evidence one way or the other about it (the Slips' own Angie Littwin has an nice contribution to the literature). [read post]
26 Jul 2016, 6:50 am
Ct. 1923 (2016)] is egregiousness. . . . 'The subjective willfulness of a patent infringer, intentional or knowing, may warrant enhanced damages . . . .' Assuming without deciding that the jury’s verdict, based on the subjective prong of the now-overruled [In re Seagate Tech., LLC, 497 F.3d 1360 (Fed. [read post]
26 Jul 2016, 6:35 am
Fortunately, that is not necessary, as numerous decisions have held that a claim that includes a “sum certain” for work already performed and a good faith estimate or extrapolation for work remaining to be done satisfies the CDA’s requirements. [read post]
25 Jul 2016, 12:41 pm
In re: Shawe & Elting LLC, C.A. [read post]
25 Jul 2016, 12:21 pm
FISA, for example, is not everyone’s cup of tea, but it is a dense set of rules that prohibits certain types of abuses we’re particularly afraid of. [read post]
25 Jul 2016, 9:48 am
The Court of Chancery recently issued its latest decision in the contentious case captioned In re Shawe & Elting LLC. [read post]
22 Jul 2016, 4:19 pm
In last week’s launch of a new bipartisan Fourth Amendment Caucus in the House, however, the Constitution has gained a formidable ally. [read post]
22 Jul 2016, 4:10 am
And it’s a time to reflect on the values that guide you in your faith -- gratitude, compassion and generosity. [read post]
21 Jul 2016, 1:54 pm
Thus, the Chancellor spoke of good faith, unconscionable conduct, unjust enrichment. [read post]
19 Jul 2016, 9:00 pm
The Constitution’s admonition that the President must “take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed” suggests both that the President must undertake a good-faith effort to effectuate a congressional statute, and also that the President must have the means to prevent or respond to a breach of faith on the part of his subordinates. [read post]
