Search for: "MATTER OF RULES OF EVIDENCE"
Results 4781 - 4800
of 42,203
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Apr 2008, 6:54 am
On another theory, rules of privacy are like rules of evidence, barring disclosure of information that particular decision-makers ought to disregard: If employers ought not to make decisions based on an employees' marital status or book purchases, then such information ought to be suppressed to purify the employment decision-making process. [read post]
18 Oct 2012, 9:55 am
If, as in the hypothetical situation presented in this blog post, the parties intended to jointly and equally own the property, and both parties contributed equally, and the Court is presented with convincing evidence of same, then it would likely rule that the parties each own fifty percent of the property. [read post]
13 Mar 2024, 12:33 pm
EPA; the First Amendment, for compelling company speech on controversial matters; and the Administrative Procedure Act, as it solves no problem within the SEC’s mandate, and includes no proper cost-benefit analysis, perils that led another SEC rule to be vacated last month. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 8:34 am
In 2009, the high court ruled that inmates don't have a "freestanding right" to demand access to DNA evidence for testing. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 2:31 pm
In Rudy Giuliani’s news show interviews, the risks of this approach are even more glaringly evident. [read post]
17 Nov 2017, 5:54 am
No. 41 at 1-2.Rule 36 states that "[a] matter is admitted unless, within 30 days after being served, the party to whom the request is directed serves on the requesting party a written answer or objection addressed to the matter and signed by the party or its attorney. [read post]
17 Nov 2017, 5:54 am
No. 41 at 1-2.Rule 36 states that "[a] matter is admitted unless, within 30 days after being served, the party to whom the request is directed serves on the requesting party a written answer or objection addressed to the matter and signed by the party or its attorney. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 11:23 am
Following Judge Vinson’s ruling in Florida, defenders of ObamaCare seized on the supposed “fact” that he declared the entire law unconstitutional as further evidence that Vinson was an unhinged jurist whose ruling placed him “outside the mainstream. [read post]
28 May 2015, 12:16 pm
The Court of Appeal rejected the argument, but the Washington Supreme Court agreed to hear the matter. [read post]
3 May 2013, 5:54 am
In Matter of Norse Energy Corp. [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 4:10 pm
Requiring expert testimony on this matter in every case would be not only silly, but wasteful, inefficient, and simply unfair. [read post]
16 May 2012, 12:51 pm
If you have any questions about this case or any other matters, please contact Attorney Robert Mazow at rem@helpinginjured.com. [read post]
8 Sep 2010, 9:11 pm
The privilege of not being forced to testify against one’s spouse has also been placed in the Utah Rules of Evidence. [read post]
2 Jul 2008, 7:25 am
The judge found evidence of more than 2 million separate violations, and awarded the class of employees $6.5 million in back wages. [read post]
28 May 2016, 8:16 am
A New York Estate Lawyer said that, in a contested probate proceeding, the objectant appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of a decree of the Surrogate’s Court, Kings County, dated April 11, 1986, as, upon a ruling made after close of all the evidence at a jury trial dismissing all her objections as a matter of law, dismissed her third objection alleging that the will was procured by the undue influence of the petitioner, admitted the will to probate and… [read post]
29 Apr 2019, 3:00 am
DEEMED ADMISSIONS CAN BE USED AS EVIDENCE BUT NOT EXPRESS DENIALS OF REQUESTED ADMISSIONS In Medina v. [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 6:54 pm
The at home parent will either give up, or the courts will rule in favour of the abducting parent.South African laws that specify hard time frames for when certain steps are to be taken by the courts are routinely ignored by court staff and judges.one judge after hearing evidence of the abuse by the father of the child (the child being terrified of the father) insisted on reintroducing the father to the child before making a Hague ruling. [read post]
28 Sep 2019, 11:19 am
The relevant rules of evidence and standards of proof are up to Congress to determine.The latter could reasonably conclude that a preponderance of evidence is proof enough. [read post]
1 Sep 2017, 6:49 am
[Chairman Whittaker]: Well, it's not evidence. [read post]
15 May 2012, 8:00 am
The proposal to analyze these disputes as a class matter does not make common sense. [read post]
