Search for: "People v. White" Results 4781 - 4800 of 7,223
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jun 2013, 11:48 am by W.F. Casey Ebsary, Jr.
 The central issue presented in the appeal was whether Terry v. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 3:00 am by Wells Bennett
The White Paper (correctly) invoked the Hamdi v. [read post]
20 Jun 2013, 5:37 am by Jim Gerl
  In later installments, I have discussed the seminal decision of TK & SK ex rel LK v. [read post]
15 Jun 2013, 7:00 am by Raffaela Wakeman
Bobby shared the White House statement to that effect; Susan explored Rep. [read post]
14 Jun 2013, 6:49 am by Patrick Cormier
Next, if you are in Canada and are looking for information on the Canadian context, the CCCT White Paper 2012 on Court Remote Appearances (also available in French here) should be your next stop. [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 9:55 am
Twain’ Connecticut Yankee v. 63   Clarence had slumped to his knees before I had half finished.... [read post]
11 Jun 2013, 1:07 pm by WIMS
This case was about giving people a role in the creation of the laws that govern their lives." [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 8:31 am by Soroush Seifi
The overwhelming result of all trials ends in a verdict of guilt for the accused and at that point another state official (bailiff, prison warden, parole officer, etc.) is obligated to apply the decision.[9]  However, Dubber clarifies that the reference to the State in the style of cause is not thought to be a requirement for the publicness of a dispute.[10]  He cites German cases that refer simply to the ‘Criminal Case against X’; a reference to ‘the… [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 8:31 am by Soroush Seifi
The overwhelming result of all trials ends in a verdict of guilt for the accused and at that point another state official (bailiff, prison warden, parole officer, etc.) is obligated to apply the decision.[9]  However, Dubber clarifies that the reference to the State in the style of cause is not thought to be a requirement for the publicness of a dispute.[10]  He cites German cases that refer simply to the ‘Criminal Case against X’; a reference to ‘the… [read post]
7 Jun 2013, 1:36 pm by Rahul Bhagnari, ACLU
Supreme Court Ruling a Blow to Genetic Privacy The Supreme Court's 5-4 Maryland v. [read post]
6 Jun 2013, 1:21 pm
As a white man, I don’t know what it is like to have others cavalierly declare that people with my skin color commit a disproportionate amount of violent crime. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 1:05 pm by Jim Gerl
  In the last installment, I discussed the seminal decision of TK & SK ex rel LK v. [read post]
3 Jun 2013, 11:58 pm by Jeff Gamso
  OK, OK, I'm maybe being unnecessarily obtuse.The Supreme Court on Monday issued its opinion in Maryland v. [read post]
31 May 2013, 6:59 am by J. Gordon Hylton
Since white women and children, free blacks, and property-less whites were counted as full persons for enumeration purposes, even though they lacked the right to vote, hold office, or serve on juries in most situations, the decision to treat enslaved people differently from others who lacked full citizenship rights was clearly to the disadvantage of those who lived in states with large slave populations. [read post]
30 May 2013, 9:05 pm by Luke Rioux
In summary, they raised the following points:Diminished capacity was first recognized as a defense in 1973 by People v. [read post]