Search for: "Powers v. Thomas"
Results 4781 - 4800
of 5,390
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jan 2010, 12:06 pm
There is a powerful formalist case for getting rid of the filibuster. [read post]
9 Jan 2010, 4:12 am
Similar to Chelak's ruling in Jannone, Kwidis also stated, in dicta, that evidence of insurance may come into evidence at trial for limited purposes.Judge Thomas Burke of the Luzerne County Court of Common Pleas ruled in Glushefski v. [read post]
8 Jan 2010, 12:22 am
" Wyeth v. [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 9:43 am
Thomas (09-5201) - definition of federal law on "good-time credits" for federal prison inmates Wed., March 31: Carachuri-Rosendo v. [read post]
31 Dec 2009, 4:40 pm
Comstock Docket: 08-1224 Argument date: January 12, 2010 Question presented: Does the Constitution give Congress the power to enact a law providing that individuals who complete federal prison sentences may still be detained indefinitely because of the risk they will commit sex crimes. ------- Title: United States v. [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 12:39 pm
O'Connor wrote the principal dissent for Justices Thomas, Scalia, and Ginsburg; but Rehnquist was in the majority. [read post]
22 Dec 2009, 2:20 pm
Thomas F. [read post]
22 Dec 2009, 5:26 am
Thomas Dale Delay et al. [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 11:53 am
While it is difficult to pinpoint a single factor that will always favour protection, US jurisprudence affords the strong legal shield of anonymity to protect individuals from the potential swords of those in power or from anyone who might seek to stifle dissent or unpopular ideas. [read post]
15 Dec 2009, 6:14 am
Thomas O. [read post]
13 Dec 2009, 9:48 pm
Capital Records, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Dec 2009, 9:02 pm
Does that mean that a powerful weapon has been lost to defendants and that sloppy claimant solicitors can rest easy? [read post]
December 14, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
13 Dec 2009, 8:58 pm
— Ross Douthat, The New York Times, December 9, 2009 In his column today, my colleague Thomas Friedman argues eloquently for a Dick Cheney-esque, “one percent doctrine” approach to climate change, which would treat caps on greenhouse emissions as a rational way to “buy insurance” against a potentially catastrophic outcome. [read post]
13 Dec 2009, 6:46 pm
Knotts, 460 U.S. 276 (1983), and United States v. [read post]
11 Dec 2009, 8:18 am
Secretary of State for Defence and Al-Saadoon and Mufdhi v. [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 4:43 am
Justice Thomas said nothing. [read post]
8 Dec 2009, 7:53 am
There is little prospect that state execution is in any imminent constitutional danger, because it is unlikely that a Supreme Court of John Roberts Jr., Antonin Scalia, Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito Jr. will soon acknowledge the failure of the Gregg v. [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 2:52 am
See all stories on this topic  Burks v. [read post]
6 Dec 2009, 6:44 am
Thomas D. [read post]
4 Dec 2009, 9:30 pm
" One of my favorite law-teaching cases in those days was something called Ortelere v. [read post]
