Search for: "Public Service Co. v. State"
Results 4781 - 4800
of 5,844
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Apr 2016, 9:21 am
Margate Shipping Co. v. [read post]
12 Dec 2008, 9:00 am
Software Pty Ltd v Bing Technologies Pty Limited (No 1) (Australian Trade Marks Law Blog) Australian Bureau of Statistics going CC, under attribution-only licence (Creative Commons) (Michael Geist) Canada Depreciation a possible ground in opposition proceedings: Parmalat Canada Inc v Sysco Corporation (Canadian Trademark Blog) Trademarks Office considers changes to opposition practice (International Law Office) Parody defence not available according to BC Supreme Court:… [read post]
25 Apr 2009, 4:50 am
Co. v. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 1:41 am
Indústria e Comércio v OHIM, Consorci de l'Espai Rural de Gallecs (Class 46) CFI: John Deere prevails before CFI with colour combination mark: BCS v OHIM, Deere (Class 46) (IPKat) CFI finds trademarks containing common element in identical font confusingly similar in Aldi Einkauf GmbH & Co v Goya Importaciones y Distribuciones (Class 46) CFI: RNAiFect and RNActive: who would get confused? [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 1:41 am
Indústria e Comércio v OHIM, Consorci de l'Espai Rural de Gallecs (Class 46) CFI: John Deere prevails before CFI with colour combination mark: BCS v OHIM, Deere (Class 46) (IPKat) CFI finds trademarks containing common element in identical font confusingly similar in Aldi Einkauf GmbH & Co v Goya Importaciones y Distribuciones (Class 46) CFI: RNAiFect and RNActive: who would get confused? [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 1:41 am
Indústria e Comércio v OHIM, Consorci de l'Espai Rural de Gallecs (Class 46) CFI: John Deere prevails before CFI with colour combination mark: BCS v OHIM, Deere (Class 46) (IPKat) CFI finds trademarks containing common element in identical font confusingly similar in Aldi Einkauf GmbH & Co v Goya Importaciones y Distribuciones (Class 46) CFI: RNAiFect and RNActive: who would get confused? [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
Indeed, as one federal court recently stated, “the ‘crypto’ nomenclature may be of recent vintage, but the challenged transactions fall comfortably within the framework that courts have used to identify securities for nearly eighty years. [read post]
12 Oct 2009, 1:42 pm
Professionals providing services to public corporations will demand compensation for bearing the risks of liability. [read post]
3 Feb 2019, 4:51 pm
Cybersecurity of the Person, First Amendment Law Review, 2019, Jeff Kosseff, United States Naval Academy, Cyber Science Department. [read post]
5 Sep 2008, 11:01 pm
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: Google Chrome EULA – Controversy over non-exclusive license clause permitting Google to use content submitted through the service: (IP Thinktank), (BriefBlog), (Copyfight), (Copyfight), (The Trademark Blog), (Public Knowledge), (Ars Technica), (IPKat), US presidential campaigns clash on patent law: (Out-Law), (IAM),… [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 12:01 pm
McIntosh, Civil Division, Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for amicus United States. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 1:44 pm
BACKGROUND As described in the first AHRC decision, “Webber Academy was founded in 1997 and has declared its mandate to be a high quality, non-denominational, co-educational, university preparatory, accredited private school. [read post]
19 Jan 2009, 4:00 am
Amelia County Sheriff's Office7th Cir.o Muslim Associate States Cause of Action Against Large Law Firm For Post 9-11 DiscriminationHasan v. [read post]
31 Dec 2020, 9:03 pm
Department of Health and Human Services, declared a public health emergency for the coronavirus outbreak, President Donald J. [read post]
29 Dec 2022, 9:05 pm
JUNE The Supreme Court, in a 6-3 decision, overturned Roe v. [read post]
15 May 2009, 7:49 am
In the end, she concluded, the NYPD’s race relations concerns “are so removed from the effective functioning of the public employer that they cannot prevail over the free speech rights of the public employee. [read post]
13 Apr 2021, 9:01 pm
For the proposition that regulations that would have been valid in 1791 are valid today, Justice Thomas cites one case, the 2010 ruling in United States v. [read post]
12 Sep 2022, 9:00 pm
Less publicized are the compelling reasons to believe the surtax may generate negative economic consequences that outweigh any social benefit from additional tax revenue. [read post]
27 Dec 2018, 8:56 am
” Walling v. [read post]
6 May 2011, 3:46 pm
He had been born to wealth and sincerely believed it must be repaid with public service, not money-seeking power. [read post]
