Search for: "STATE V. POWERS"
Results 4781 - 4800
of 41,383
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Apr 2008, 10:36 am
Powers. [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 2:02 pm
United States ex rel. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 11:59 am
Notwithstanding the Court's citation of Ashwander v. [read post]
7 May 2021, 12:53 pm
Kuhn Chevrolet or Herron v. [read post]
14 Dec 2017, 11:28 am
” It is well established in cases from Virginia State Board of Pharmacy v. [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 7:46 am
Access Corp. v. [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 10:10 am
The decision in the case of Arizona v. [read post]
29 Sep 2020, 9:15 am
On September 24, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) affirmed-in-part and reversed-in-part the U.S. [read post]
28 Mar 2017, 9:00 am
Sierra Club v. [read post]
9 Mar 2017, 9:00 am
Matejek v. [read post]
10 Dec 2014, 9:00 am
., v. [read post]
23 Oct 2014, 4:10 pm
Legal scholar Ilya Somin at the Volokh Conspiracy has authored an interesting and lengthy post critiquing parts of the article. http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/volokh-conspiracy/wp/2014/10/20/does-justice-thomas-endorse-the-supreme-courts-notorious-decision-inkorematsu-v-united-states/ Respectfully, I think Ilya is wrong. [read post]
17 Nov 2017, 1:20 pm
Also, Mitchell Keiter (Keiter Appellate Law) argues that SCOTUS should reverse the 9th Circuit in 'NIFLA v. [read post]
29 Sep 2021, 6:55 pm
In United States v. [read post]
12 Jun 2024, 5:50 am
[CNN] * More states suing Apple for using monopoly power in the smartphone market to mess with developers. [read post]
10 May 2021, 4:00 am
George Wright, Free Exercise and the Public Interest After Tandon v. [read post]
17 Jun 2021, 3:25 am
Collins v. [read post]
12 Mar 2014, 9:00 am
Cheswick Generating Station case, which held that the federal Clean Air Act (“CAA”) does not preempt state common law tort claims in a putative class action filed by over 1,500 residents complaining that the operations of GenOn Power Midwest, L.P. [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 12:41 pm
Martinez v. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 2:21 pm
Maybe the Supreme Court should start kicking cases on the ground of a "textual committment to a co-equal branch" of government as the political question doctrine stated in Baker v. [read post]
