Search for: "STATE v. SMALL" Results 4781 - 4800 of 16,885
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Apr 2011, 3:04 pm by Madelaine Lane
  Accordingly, the court concluded that prejudice must be presumed under United States v Cronic, 466 US 648; 104 S Ct 2039; 80 L Ed 2d 657 (1984). [read post]
7 Feb 2016, 12:30 am by Emily Prifogle
Williams's Defenders of the Unborn: The Pro-Life Movement before Roe v. [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 5:00 pm
 We thought of this in regard to Clarington v. [read post]
13 Aug 2013, 6:28 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
That ruling also puts the kabosh on another proposed class action brought under the Fair Labor Standards Act.The case is Southerland v. [read post]
20 May 2013, 11:06 am by Lee Davis
Garrett, the Sixth Circuit dealt with a case where an attorney made a very small mistake on an electronic court filing. [read post]
20 Jun 2016, 4:59 am by David Markus
United States (argued February 23, 2016). [read post]
11 Mar 2020, 1:59 am by Sophie Corke
It aims to establish trade mark liability in certain circumstances for online marketplaces which do not crack down on the sale of counterfeit products on their platforms.On the TTABlog, there was commentary on the standard applied by the USPTO when confronted with a sign in another language (in this case, whether MONFRÈRE FASHION is liable to be confused with MY BROTHER).PatentsThe FPC Review commented on how to interpret expressions stating a purpose in patent claim construction,… [read post]
10 Feb 2013, 5:11 pm by Daniel E. Cummins
In his recent December 6, 2012 decision, Judge Jonathan Mark of the Monroe County Court of Common Pleas recently granted summary judgment in favor of a ski resort in the case of Freeman v. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 12:30 am
 Deliberations continue today in State v. [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 8:41 am
As the Court stated, "detriment forms the backbone of a claim of proprietary estoppel because it is detriment that gives rise to the unfairness which requires equity to intervene. [read post]
30 Jun 2024, 8:46 am by Russell Knight
This rule is contrary to the holding of the appellate court in Coons v. [read post]