Search for: "State Bank v. United States" Results 4781 - 4800 of 7,410
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Apr 2012, 5:11 am by Joe Palazzolo
United States (11-247), in which the court will decide whether the state's controversial immigration law usurps the federal government's authority to regulate immigration laws and enforcement. [read post]
21 Apr 2012, 11:04 pm by Tyson Snow
Nuvolari has not sought authorization to do business in—and is not registered to do business in—any state in the United States. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 9:34 pm
(c) A sale with recourse is still a sale. 2.2 In support, the Bank relied on two famous cases of Welsh Development Agency v. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 4:15 pm
On April 18, 2012, the United States Supreme Court ruled unanimously that the Torture Victim Protection Act of 1991 does not authorize lawsuits against entities such as corporations, states, or political groups. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 8:10 am by South Florida Lawyers
First, EESA and HAMP were designed to “provide authority and facilities that the Secretary of the Treasury can use to restore liquidity and stability to the financial system of the United States. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 6:50 am by Bryan Fears
The Supreme Court of the United States of America has interpreted various provisions of the Bankruptcy Code during the past 100+ years. [read post]
13 Apr 2012, 11:49 am by William McGrath
" In a second case, the SEC announced on March 27, 2012 that it has sued John Cinderey, a former executive vice president at United Commercial Bank for aiding and abetting securities law violations relating to falsifying books and records and misleading the bank's auditors. [read post]
13 Apr 2012, 8:47 am by Gmlevine
Although websites are “the prevalent use” [The Hong Kong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited v. [read post]
12 Apr 2012, 1:27 pm by Lauren Abbott
HSBC Bank, USA, et al. in the United States Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit in support of the consumer-appellant, arguing that courts have not correctly interpreted the federal Truth-in-Lending Act (“TILA”) regarding how long a consumer has to rescind a mortgage loan. [read post]
12 Apr 2012, 1:08 am by Kevin LaCroix
Section 929P(b)(2) provide extraterritorial effect for these types actions when certain defined types of conduct take place in the United States or when it takes place outside the United States with a foreseeable effect in the U.S. [read post]