Search for: "State of California v. United States" Results 4781 - 4800 of 13,839
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Oct 2017, 7:00 am
My family moved to the United States from South Korea when I was six years old. [read post]
Courts throughout the country have recognized the principle that small increments of time are not compensable, including the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
Courts throughout the country have recognized the principle that small increments of time are not compensable, including the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
1 Oct 2017, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
United States A New Hampshire jury has found the owner of mortgage company who used electronic billboards to accuse three businessmen of crimes liable for defamation damages of $274.5 million. [read post]
29 Sep 2017, 9:28 am by Victoria Kwan
District Court for the Eastern District of California conference on civil discourse. [read post]
28 Sep 2017, 7:22 am by NCC Staff
Collins claims Virginia’s courts expanded the automobile exception beyond precedents set the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
27 Sep 2017, 12:52 pm by Steven Koprince
United States Postal Service, PSBCA No. 6683 (2017) began in August 2016, when Triumph Donnelly mailed a package from South Carolina to California using Priority Mail. [read post]
27 Sep 2017, 5:20 am by Hon. Richard G. Kopf
That California judge, featured in Time Magazine,[v] is William W. [read post]
26 Sep 2017, 4:43 am by Edith Roberts
Additional coverage comes from John Myers in the Los Angeles Times, who reports that California is one of 11 states that filed a brief opposing the Ohio system, and from Sabrina Eaton at Cleveland.com, who reports that Sen. [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 7:19 am by Beth Graham
  The Northern District of California denied the company’s motion and Uber filed an appeal with the United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 5:17 am by Andrew King
United States, holding that the use of a “Stingray” cellsite simulator required a warrant under the Fourth Amendment, Chris Seaton and Andrew King were challenged to debate whether the Third-Party Doctrine or the Supreme Court’s Riley v. [read post]