Search for: "State v. Burden"
Results 4781 - 4800
of 22,145
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Nov 2014, 6:16 am
SSUK relied heavily on Sabaf SpA v Meneghetti SpA [2003] RPC 14 at [59], which states that the joint tortfeasor must have “made the tortious act his own”. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 6:57 am
SME Steel Contractors, Inc. v. [read post]
26 May 2023, 12:42 pm
Abbott v. [read post]
16 Sep 2008, 1:00 pm
Sec. 1441 permits removal of diversity cases only if no defendant "properly joined and served" is a resident of the state in which the case was filed. [read post]
1 May 2009, 6:43 am
State Farm Fire & Cas. [read post]
11 Apr 2025, 5:08 am
The words “legal malpractice” are mentioned only in passing, yet Medical Supply of NY Corp. v State Farm Mut. [read post]
7 Nov 2021, 10:14 am
The case is We the Patriots, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 10:37 am
The decision is Gardner v. [read post]
4 Jul 2021, 4:39 pm
Relying on Justice Gorsuch’s decision in Yellowbear v. [read post]
13 Jan 2020, 12:16 pm
But that includes the silliness of having the state fight about them. [read post]
26 Sep 2024, 8:19 am
Case Citation: Dangaard v. [read post]
8 May 2019, 9:10 am
While the final result is uncertain, the government bears a heavy burden to demonstrate why the preliminary decision is wrong. [read post]
6 Jan 2020, 8:47 am
In the brief the Trump administration states, “The burdens of Act 620 are minimal—principally, a modest increase in the waiting time (less than an hour) to obtain an abortion. [read post]
2 Apr 2008, 8:30 am
Texas v. [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 4:42 pm
Both the United States Supreme Court and the New York Court of Appeals have held that once a defendant chooses to be represented by counsel, counsel and not the defendant has control over most strategic decisions are made by the attorney and not the defendant (Jones v Barnes, 463 US 745, 751 [1983]; People v White, 73 NY2d 468, 478 [1989]). [read post]
7 Feb 2016, 11:37 am
In Leary v United States, 395 US 6, 33 [1969], the Supreme Court held that “a criminal statutory presumption must be regarded as ‘irrational’ or ‘arbitrary,’ and hence unconstitutional, unless it can at least be said with substantial assurance that the presumed fact is more likely than not to flow from the proved fact on which it is made to depend. [read post]
7 Feb 2016, 11:37 am
In Leary v United States, 395 US 6, 33 [1969], the Supreme Court held that “a criminal statutory presumption must be regarded as ‘irrational’ or ‘arbitrary,’ and hence unconstitutional, unless it can at least be said with substantial assurance that the presumed fact is more likely than not to flow from the proved fact on which it is made to depend. [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 8:15 am
Supreme Court ruled in Burwell v. [read post]
18 Feb 2021, 4:30 am
Accordingly, the Appellate Division concluded that Supreme Court should have granted those branches of the petition which sought to compel disclosure of the documents sought in Plaintiff's FOIL requests that were the subject of this appeal. * New York State Public Officers Law Article 6. ** See Matter of Data Tree, LLC v Romaine, 9 NY3d 454.*** The basic concept underlying FOIL is that all government documents and records, other than those having access specifically limited… [read post]
20 Dec 2012, 11:25 am
Posted by Morin JacobHarris v. [read post]
