Search for: "State v. Doctor"
Results 4781 - 4800
of 9,632
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Dec 2014, 5:49 pm
In Rivera v. [read post]
8 Dec 2014, 7:48 am
When asked whether he had received their permission, he stated that he had no comment. [read post]
8 Dec 2014, 7:41 am
As a result, his doctors recommended that he do little or no traveling. [read post]
8 Dec 2014, 5:35 am
State v. [read post]
7 Dec 2014, 2:21 pm
He may be convicted only if an impartial jury of his peers is unanimously of the view that he is guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and so states, publicly, in its verdict. [read post]
5 Dec 2014, 1:51 pm
On Wednesday, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Young v. [read post]
5 Dec 2014, 6:47 am
This makes signals weaker medicine, but also safer and, perhaps, just what the doctor ordered. [read post]
5 Dec 2014, 4:16 am
Two justices dissented, stating that the record was "replete with testimony from both sides that these reprehensible incidents did occur and that claimant became upset to the point where she lost control at work and left to see a doctor. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 6:18 am
Neither the doctor’s conclusion that he was not a “future” threat nor the temporal proximity to his protected activity was enough to raise an issue of fact on pretext (Curley v. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 12:53 am
Case of Escher v. [read post]
3 Dec 2014, 3:52 pm
Related Blog PostsMassachusetts Hospital Had No Duty of Care to Physician’s Future Patients in Another State – Roe v. [read post]
3 Dec 2014, 1:31 pm
There are different levels of trauma centers: Level I, II, III, IV, and V. [read post]
3 Dec 2014, 7:26 am
The Supreme Court today hears oral argument in Young v. [read post]
3 Dec 2014, 6:54 am
Both the employee and her doctor stated that she was suffering from fatigue related to her MS. [read post]
2 Dec 2014, 11:11 pm
Today's post is shared from insurancejournal.com/The Florida Supreme Court is considering whether to declare the state’s workers’ compensation attorney fee schedule unconstitutional.The court recently heard oral arguments in a case (Castellanos v. [read post]
2 Dec 2014, 10:51 am
First, we consider whether a doctor’s finding that Curley did not pose a safety threat belies one of the City’s stated reasons for firing him—his long history of threatening coworkers. . . .Curley received many oral and written reprimands during his employment with the City. [read post]
2 Dec 2014, 8:22 am
Arguing for the woman involved in Young v. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 11:12 am
In Perez v. [read post]
30 Nov 2014, 12:00 am
Consider, for the moment, the case of State v. [read post]
29 Nov 2014, 3:53 am
"In particular, no explanation has been proffered to the effect that he consulted a qualified and clearly identified medical practitioner elsewhere and that indeed a doctor is the signatory of the document. [read post]
