Search for: "State v. Law" Results 4781 - 4800 of 173,868
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Dec 2010, 4:00 am by Rosalind English
The Child Poverty Action Group (Respondent) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions(Appellant) [2010] UKSC 54 – Read judgment / press release The Supreme Court has ruled that where benefits are overpaid as a result of a mistaken calculation, the department responsible cannot claim these amounts back via the common law route of restitution; the Secretary of State’s only recourse is via Section 71 of the Social Security Administration Act. [read post]
4 Nov 2023, 8:43 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Castro-Huerta, the Supreme Court departed from one of the foundational cases in federal Indian law, Worcester v. [read post]
6 Sep 2019, 12:14 am by INFORRM
In particular, the court considered the deemed lawful taking of photographs by police officers as in R (Wood) v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis [2010] 1 WLR 123 and R (Catt) v Association of Chief Police Officers [2015] AC 1065. [read post]
8 May 2019, 12:22 pm by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
United States of America (Federal Recognition) State Courts Bulletin https://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2019.htmlT.W. v. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 6:43 am by admin
In a case illustrating how a minority position can shift into a majority holding, the Supreme Court of the United States held in Coleman v. [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 9:00 pm by Lawrence Solum
Joseph Blocher (Duke Law School) has posted Popular Constitutionalism and the State Attorneys General (Harvard Law Review Forum, Vol. 122, p. 108, 2011) on SSRN. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 11:29 am by The Federalist Society
 Justice Ginsburg filed a dissenting opinion, which was joined by Justice Kennedy, and by Justice Scalia in all except Parts III and V–B–1.To discuss the case, we have Kristen Osenga, who is a Professor of Law at the University of Richmond School of Law. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 11:29 am by The Federalist Society
 Justice Ginsburg filed a dissenting opinion, which was joined by Justice Kennedy, and by Justice Scalia in all except Parts III and V–B–1.To discuss the case, we have Kristen Osenga, who is a Professor of Law at the University of Richmond School of Law. [read post]
15 Apr 2014, 9:58 am
However, the ruling doesn't mean that former spouses automatically are entitled to a portion of their ex's military retirement pay, and each case is decided according to individual facts and state law. [read post]
24 Nov 2012, 7:14 am by Allard Knook
Similarly, the originally private nature of the resources did not prevent them being regarded as State resources within the meaning of Art. 87(1) EC (see, to that effect, Case T‑358/94 Air France v Commission [1996]).In accordance with the case-law, the mere fact that a subsidy scheme benefiting certain economic operators in a given sector was wholly or partially financed by contributions imposed by the public authority and levied on the undertakings concerned was… [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 7:02 am by Paul Venard
The Supreme Court last year ruled in District of Columbia v. [read post]
7 Jun 2009, 9:41 pm
  This is because you have to know quite a bit about both federal law and constitutional law to understand it. [read post]
25 Feb 2016, 5:46 am by SHG
And in a note on its website on Monday, Apple said law enforcement agencies nationwide “have hundreds of iPhones they want Apple to unlock if the F.B.I. [read post]