Search for: "State v. Money" Results 4781 - 4800 of 20,471
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jun 2013, 4:36 pm by Brad Kuhn
 Because the United State Supreme Court just issued its decision in Koontz v. [read post]
12 Dec 2018, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Taylor Law amended to clarify an employee organization's duty of fair representation of non-members in a collective bargaining unit  Section 209-a.2 of the Civil Service LawIn Janus v American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, et al, 138 SCt 2448, the Supreme Court held that "States and public-sector unions may no longer extract agency fees from nonconsenting employees. [read post]
6 Sep 2017, 5:01 am by James Edward Maule
Because local laws varied from state to state, Congress enacted what is now section 73 in order to create uniformity. [read post]
6 May 2024, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Solum, Original Public Meaning, (Michigan State Law Review, Vol. 2023, No. 807).Liz Tobin-Tyler, Putting Your Money Where Your Mouth Is: Maternal Health Policy After Dobbs, (Seton Hall Law Review, Vol. 53, 2023).Carlo A. [read post]
15 Sep 2020, 2:56 pm by Unknown
 "He falsely told Ryan that Ruby was not entitled to information and that she had to wait for her money from the State, when all along he had it in his possession not subject to any court or state order. [read post]
2 Aug 2013, 7:20 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
This does not mean that the courts are recognizing new gun rights.The case is Kwong v. [read post]
12 Dec 2018, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Taylor Law amended to clarify an employee organization's duty of fair representation of non-members in a collective bargaining unit  Section 209-a.2 of the Civil Service LawIn Janus v American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, et al, 138 SCt 2448, the Supreme Court held that "States and public-sector unions may no longer extract agency fees from nonconsenting employees. [read post]
17 Dec 2015, 9:47 am by Barbara S. Mishkin
Mishkin The CFPB, together with the FTC, has filed an amicus brief in Franklin v. [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 3:45 am by Russ Bensing
Well, buck up, Sparky, because after 8th District’s decision last week in State v. [read post]
But, to understand why states are stuck with an untenable self-reporting sales tax system, we need to look at a previous case, Quill v. [read post]
20 Feb 2007, 12:24 pm
  Although he continued to live in NY and Shondel and the child continued to reside in Guyana, Mark D. sent money and maintained telephone contact, but when the money slacked off, Shondel filed an action in New York Family Court for a filiation order and a child support order. [read post]
21 Jun 2016, 9:50 am by Katharine Lammiman
The members of Eclipse borrowed money (approximately £840 million) to contribute towards its capital, paid interest (approximately £293 million) on the money borrowed and intended to receive tax relief on that interest. [read post]