Search for: "TOWNING v. STATE"
Results 4781 - 4800
of 5,892
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jun 2010, 4:06 am
Having a residence in the jurisdiction not always the same as having a domicile in the jurisdictionMatter of Johnson v Town of Amherst, 2010 NY Slip Op 05447, Decided on June 18, 2010, Appellate Division, Fourth DepartmentThe Town of Amherst’s Town Code required its employees to be “domiciliaries of the Town. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 2:46 am
Although the European Court of Human Rights this week struck a blow to the marriage equality campaign in Schalk and Kopf v Austria by holding that Article 12 of the ECHR (the right to marriage) did not oblige states to ensure marriage equality, the reasoning was based on the lack of a European consensus on the matter. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 12:36 pm
Maxwell (1966) and Estes v. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 6:53 am
In 1966, the Texas Supreme Court, in the case, Royal Endemnity Company v. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 1:51 am
Secretary of State for the Home Department v AP (No 2) [2010] UKSC 26; [2010] WLR (D) 154 ”The public interest in publishing a full report of control order proceedings, identifying the suspected terrorist involved, had to give way to the need to protect the suspected terrorist from the risk of violence in circumstances where he was required to live in a town in which there were considerable community tensions and racist attacks on members of the Muslim… [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 5:29 pm
State. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 7:16 pm
Next comes State of West Virginia v. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 5:53 pm
East West Resort Development V, L.P., L.L.L.P. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 9:59 am
Walgreen Co. v. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 1:50 am
Walgreen Co. v. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 1:45 am
Beutz v. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 1:45 am
Beutz v. [read post]
20 Jun 2010, 11:36 pm
Supreme Court, in Mac's Shell Service v. [read post]
20 Jun 2010, 9:17 pm
United States v. [read post]
20 Jun 2010, 11:52 am
Defending and indemnifying employeesZimmer v Town of Brookhaven, 247 A.D.2d 109When a public employee is sued in connection with his or her performance of, or his or her failure to perform, official duties, usually he or she is entitled to look to his or her employer to provided him or her with representation in the proceeding. [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 2:52 pm
Dukes v. [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 3:31 am
Dukes v. [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 3:25 am
Concerning the so-called “Blue Wall of Silence”Diesel v Town of Lewisboro, CA2, 232 F.3d 92While some might allege that there is a "blue wall of silence"* encouraged by certain individuals involved in law enforcement, rarely does one find a court decision that specifically addresses the concept.Not so in the Diesel case. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 11:45 am
In Matter of Jones v Town of Carroll the court found that landfill operations were similar to mining operations and therefore the Court's recent holding in Glacial Aggregates LLC v. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 11:45 am
In Matter of Jones v Town of Carroll the court found that landfill operations were similar to mining operations and therefore the Court's recent holding in Glacial Aggregates LLC v. [read post]
