Search for: "The National Plaintiffs Group" Results 4781 - 4800 of 7,332
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Dec 2013, 10:19 am by Mike Madison
Energy Intelligence Group, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 9:21 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
The EEOC's systemic program - in which the Commission emphasizes the identification, investigation, and litigation of discrimination claims affecting large groups of "alleged victims" - grew to its largest level ever. [read post]
3 Apr 2019, 8:54 am by John Baker
The plaintiffs in the two combined New York cases number 18 states, the District of Columbia, and various cities and counties, as well as a coalition of 175 nonprofit groups. [read post]
10 Sep 2009, 1:49 pm
Bursch, chair of the appellate group at Warner Norcross & Judd LLP’s Grand Rapids office, who also wrote an amicus brief in Benefiel. [read post]
31 Jul 2019, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
The FEC had determined AIPAC was not such a “political committee,” and a group of voters, led by Akins, disputed that determination. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 4:23 am by INFORRM
  First, there was the decision of the Court of Appeal in ETK v News Group Newspapers ([2011] EWCA Civ 439). [read post]
28 Aug 2019, 5:21 am by Eugene Volokh
Under the act, however, an individual who has committed no such misconduct cannot be excluded solely because he falls within a class of persons whom the owner believes is more likely to engage in misconduct than some other group. [read post]
24 Aug 2020, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Indeed, Puruczky and Connor Group involved injunctions entered in response to libel lawsuits. [read post]
25 Aug 2023, 6:22 pm by admin
In the absence of direct biochemical, physiological, or genetic mechanisms that can be identified as involved in bringing about the plaintiffs’ harm, epidemiologic evidence will be required, and it may well be the “gold standard” in such cases.[4] When epidemiologic evidence is required, counsel will usually be justified in adverting to the “hierarchy of epidemiologic evidence. [read post]
2 Jun 2008, 12:46 am
Plaintiffs lawyers are seeking $6 million of the settlement in fees. [read post]
15 Aug 2014, 11:21 am by Cody Poplin
In an opinion piece in the Wall Street Journal, former National Security Advisor Gen. [read post]
12 Mar 2013, 4:15 am by Michael Posluns
In MMF, the plaintiffs had sought declaratory relief primarily on the ground of the Crown’s fiduciary obligations. [read post]
24 Oct 2007, 12:54 am
Found by the jury to be 50 percent negligent, PHLX was on the hook for over $1 million, including delay damages, said plaintiffs attorneys. [read post]
19 Apr 2007, 1:11 am
The plaintiff, a manufacturer named in tens of thousands of claims, had argued that only specific asbestosis claims were excluded. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 1:20 am
The plaintiffs were seeking to recover damages from the drug manufacturer as a racketeering enterprise that forced them to pay excess prices. [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 6:52 am by Kevin Johnson
Roberts noted that, although standing doctrine barred the plaintiffs from federal court, Congress could take the action sought by the environmental groups: Standing is an apolitical limitation on judicial power. [read post]