Search for: "U. S. Federal Government"
Results 4781 - 4800
of 5,046
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Apr 2009, 1:42 pm
, 31 U. [read post]
11 Apr 2009, 10:10 am
You can view the federal government's brief here. [read post]
7 Apr 2009, 10:55 am
., 318 U. [read post]
5 Apr 2009, 1:26 pm
In September 2008, the government takeover of mortgage giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac was followed by the collapse of Lehman Brothers, the acquisition of Merrill Lynch by Bank of America and an $85 billion (and now $170 billion) government investment in American International Group. [read post]
4 Apr 2009, 10:47 pm
S. [read post]
1 Apr 2009, 3:14 pm
Collins, 506 U. [read post]
31 Mar 2009, 1:57 pm
The judiciary was not the only branch of government to follow Rich's view. [read post]
30 Mar 2009, 7:55 pm
Batarfi's habeas petition is scheduled to be heard in federal court April 6. [read post]
29 Mar 2009, 11:37 am
My inspiration for this question is George Will's column denouncing the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act as an excessively broad delegation of power to the Secretary of the Treasury to spend federal dollars. [read post]
24 Mar 2009, 11:28 pm
S. [read post]
24 Mar 2009, 9:00 pm
New York, 404 U. [read post]
23 Mar 2009, 1:22 pm
S. government in the field of education. [read post]
23 Mar 2009, 4:30 am
Jose corroborated Ramon's testify concerning the 1995 transfer of Ramon's shares to Dennis and Jose equally. [read post]
16 Mar 2009, 11:44 am
" 307 U. [read post]
14 Mar 2009, 12:06 am
United States, 406 U S 441, 92 S Ct. 1653, 32 L.Ed. 212 (1972), we recently reaffirmed the principle that the privilege against self-incrimination can be asserted in any proceeding, civil or criminal, administrative or judicial, investigatory, or adjudicatory. [read post]
13 Mar 2009, 10:59 am
Sorrell, 548 U. [read post]
12 Mar 2009, 9:00 am
Best's review of AIG's operating entities goes beyond the government's involvement and its ability to stabilize AIG and protect the interests of policyholders. [read post]
12 Mar 2009, 7:05 am
Chadha, 462 U. [read post]
12 Mar 2009, 5:27 am
Si creemos que la respuesta es poco, hemos visto el futuro.Nota: en disidencia, Nate Silver, el de 538, dice en el post que linkeamos que "we'll need to see a supermajority of Americans in favor of decriminalizing pot before the federal government would dare to take action on it (y dice que eso podrá ocurrir en 2022 o en 2023). [read post]
12 Mar 2009, 1:22 am
It's basically a corporate giveaway," said Jessica Litman, a copyright law professor at U-M. [read post]
