Search for: "US v. Shields"
Results 4781 - 4800
of 4,947
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Dec 2007, 1:24 pm
In Lamar Homes, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Dec 2007, 1:24 pm
In Lamar Homes, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Dec 2007, 5:32 am
Case Name: Layland v. [read post]
21 Dec 2007, 5:32 am
Case Name: Layland v. [read post]
20 Dec 2007, 7:57 am
" Lamie v. [read post]
17 Dec 2007, 4:59 pm
In Rape Shield Law: CAPSHAW V. [read post]
17 Dec 2007, 8:18 am
See Venegas-Hernandez v. [read post]
16 Dec 2007, 2:58 pm
McGrane v. [read post]
12 Dec 2007, 11:59 pm
Bartholomew Verdirame, Tony V. [read post]
11 Dec 2007, 9:19 pm
"The fugitive disentitlement doctrine permits a court to dismiss an appeal if the party seeking relief is a fugitive while the matter is pending' (Degen v United States, 517 US 820, 824 [1996]; see Ortega-Rodriguez v United States, 507 US 234, 242 [1993]). [read post]
10 Dec 2007, 3:51 am
The record does not indicate that the officers asked defendant to step behind a car door, used their bodies to screen defendant from public view, or took other action to shield defendant during the search, as the officers did in Smith. 118 N.C. [read post]
8 Dec 2007, 5:03 pm
by Associated PressOpinionSupreme Court of MissouriCase Style: State of Missouri, Res. v. [read post]
7 Dec 2007, 9:27 am
The answer is complicated by a long line of New York case precedent, most notably Weisman v Awnair Corp. decided by New York’s highest court in 1957, holding that a partnership may not exist where the business is conducted in corporate form, and parties may not be partners between themselves while using the corporate shield to protect themselves against personal liability. [read post]
7 Dec 2007, 9:27 am
The answer is complicated by a long line of New York case precedent, most notably Weisman v Awnair Corp. decided by New York’s highest court in 1957, holding that a partnership may not exist where the business is conducted in corporate form, and parties may not be partners between themselves while using the corporate shield to protect themselves against personal liability. [read post]
6 Dec 2007, 11:00 am
Back in July, we discussed a case called Ticconi v. [read post]
30 Nov 2007, 4:21 pm
GAO Space: Yes, for GAO report mavens (and who among us is not one?) [read post]
30 Nov 2007, 8:18 am
The SCOTUS heard oral arguments yesterday in Rowe v. [read post]
30 Nov 2007, 5:23 am
For an interesting procedural twist, check out pages 155 - 161 of the slip opinion, detailing the city's attempt to use federal jurisdiction as both a sword and a shield. [read post]
26 Nov 2007, 2:45 am
It reports a story about LR5-A Limited Partnership v. [read post]
22 Nov 2007, 6:35 pm
Beginning with its decision in Mallinkrodt v. [read post]
