Search for: "United States v. David" Results 4781 - 4800 of 6,867
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jan 2012, 4:27 pm by INFORRM
’” (Similar sentiments about the role of NGOs can be seen in Steel and Morris v United Kingdom (2005) 41 EHRR 403, [89] and Vides Aizsardz? [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 12:27 am by Graeme Hall
In the courts Jean PEARSON v the United Kingdom – 40957/07 [2011] ECHR 2319 (13 December 2011). [read post]
8 Jan 2012, 7:56 pm
Begging the question, does the next age in software protection belong to copyright (see Apple v Psystar, Oracle v Google)? [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 8:45 am by Amy Howe
The United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit rejected the agents’ argument. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 6:57 am by Conor McEvily
  The Associated Press (via the Washington Post) and David Savage of the Los Angeles Times both preview Sackett v. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 4:38 am by Renee Newman Knake
Velazquez and legal advice and advocacy as protected speech; how Citizens United intersects with NAACP v. [read post]
1 Jan 2012, 10:53 am by christopher
How ironic that Gore’s Bush v Gore attorney, David Boies, represents another Prince in borrowed armor. [read post]
31 Dec 2011, 1:48 pm by Steve Vladeck
”) In this post, we will address David Cole’s concerns about the relationship between the AUMF detention authority and the laws of war. [read post]
31 Dec 2011, 1:43 pm by Steve Vladeck
” And, as to lifetime detention of U.S. persons, the bill by its very terms (thanks to an amendment introduced by Senator Feinstein) confirms what would have been the proper reading anyway—namely, that its detention authorization provision (section 1021) does not “affect existing law or authorities relating to the detention of United States citizens, lawful resident aliens of the United States, or any other persons who are captured or arrested… [read post]
31 Dec 2011, 1:20 pm by Marty Lederman
”) In this post, we will address David Cole’s concerns about the relationship between the AUMF detention authority and the laws of war. [read post]
31 Dec 2011, 1:19 pm by Marty Lederman
” And, as to lifetime detention of U.S. persons, the bill by its very terms (thanks to an amendment introduced by Senator Feinstein) confirms what would have been the proper reading anyway—namely, that its detention authorization provision (section 1021) does not “affect existing law or authorities relating to the detention of United States citizens, lawful resident aliens of the United States, or any other persons who are captured or arrested in… [read post]
30 Dec 2011, 2:45 am by Editor Charlie
AFTRA is a member of the AFL-CIO, which is the largest federation of unions in the United States with over 10 million members. [read post]