Search for: "United States v. Good"
Results 4781 - 4800
of 21,068
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jan 2014, 4:21 pm
Jordan, United States v. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 4:02 pm
Valenti v. [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 3:23 am
Barclays Capital Inc. and Barclays PLC v. [read post]
6 Feb 2014, 7:49 am
So now we have precedent that blesses a tax that may violate the United States Constitution. [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 11:04 am
The case is United States ex rel. [read post]
9 Jan 2018, 6:35 pm
First up was Byrd v. [read post]
8 Dec 2014, 1:50 pm
United States is one of those cases only a lawyer would love or would hate, depending on which side of the dispute you happen to be. [read post]
17 May 2017, 8:31 am
If you are not doing so already, please follow my Twitter feed @customslawblog or check it in the box on this page.In the meantime, the Court of International Trade issued an opinion in United States v. [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 10:25 am
Judge Kleinfeld holds (indeed, waxes poetic about the fact) that the federal courts shouldn't resolve a continuing and longstanding dispute between various Indian tribes about how much fish each tribe is allowed to take under a series of treaties with the United States in the 1850s. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 3:06 pm
According to the Census Bureau, there are fewer than 100 people with the last name of Travolta in the entire United States. [read post]
18 Nov 2018, 7:12 pm
State Bd. of Ed. v. [read post]
18 Nov 2018, 7:12 pm
State Bd. of Ed. v. [read post]
7 Feb 2013, 5:38 am
United States, __ A.3d __ (D.C. 2013), the defendant was taken into custody under suspicion of having robbed an elderly woman. [read post]
6 Jan 2010, 5:15 pm
State v. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 1:22 pm
United States this morning. [read post]
24 Apr 2021, 6:07 am
United States Dep't of Labor, 477 F. [read post]
7 Feb 2021, 6:20 am
The big loser, of course, was the United States, now rated a flawed democracy because of the quantitative effects of Mr. [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 11:26 pm
Yesterday three U.S. government agencies--the Antitrust Division (ATR) of the United States Department of Justice (DOJ), the United States Patent & Trademark Office (USPTO), and the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST)--invited stakeholders to submit comments by early January on a new draft policy statement on standard-essential patents (SEPs).I applaud the Biden Administration for taking--at least this stage--a very centrist position. [read post]
10 Jun 2007, 10:00 am
United States v. [read post]
24 Aug 2008, 11:53 am
United States v. [read post]
