Search for: "United States v. Herring" Results 4781 - 4800 of 23,692
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Aug 2016, 12:53 pm by Patrick E. Knie
 Recently, a case was filed in the United States District Court of South Carolina, alleging that a deceased man’s civil rights had been violated after he died on the job. [read post]
28 Aug 2016, 12:53 pm by Patrick E. Knie
 Recently, a case was filed in the United States District Court of South Carolina, alleging that a deceased man’s civil rights had been violated after he died on the job. [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 6:34 pm by Michael M. O'Hear
Ginsburg’s position here recalls her (also unexplained) flip between the Scalia and Breyer camps in United States v. [read post]
20 Sep 2020, 9:03 pm by Lynn McDonough
– Writing for the Court in United States v. [read post]
19 Nov 2012, 3:56 am by Russ Bensing
SCOTUS has come down with its first opinion of the term, holding in United States v. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 5:30 am by INFORRM
In R (on the application of Naik) v Secretary of State for the Home Department ([2011] EWCA Civ 1546) the Court of Appeal confirmed that the exclusion of an Indian Muslim public speaker from the United Kingdom after making statements which breached the Home Office’s “unacceptable behaviours policy” was lawful, and that any interference with his rights was justified. [read post]
21 Jun 2005, 6:27 pm
United States, No. 04-5286 (June 20, 2005) holding that the 1 year limitations period under 2255(3) "begins to run on the date on which this Court 'initially recognized' the right asserted in an applicant's motion, not the date on which that right was made retroactive" Peter Godlberger, through a post at BOPWatch as well as his comment at Sentencing Law and Policy here, has alerted to the importance of Dodd to persons whose sentences became final before… [read post]
23 Jun 2019, 5:51 pm
The taxpayer in this case filed her petition to the United States Tax Court in 2009 and the taxes were first assessed in 2007, and she did so pro se – without counsel (at least not on record). [read post]