Search for: "Weeks v. United States"
Results 4781 - 4800
of 19,102
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Mar 2011, 3:45 am
Busy week for the Supreme Court. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 8:25 pm
One example is found in a case the Seventh Circuit decided last week, Gonzalez v. [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 8:03 pm
This is a quick follow-up to last week's post on an amicus curiae brief by Lawyers for Civil Justice:Judge Lucy Koh of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California has granted an Apple motion for relief from a non-dispositive order by Magistrate Judge Nathaniel Cousins, who imposed sanctions on Apple for failure to timely provide documents sought by Qualcomm in its defense against the Federal Trade Commission's antitrust lawsuit. [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 5:47 am
In less than a week, the Court will hear oral arguments in Friedrichs v. [read post]
21 Sep 2022, 2:43 pm
United States (Trust Relationship; Mineral Leasing) State Courts Bulletin https://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2022.html Ahtna, Inc. v. [read post]
26 May 2018, 7:54 pm
Guevara-Solórzano v. [read post]
11 Sep 2008, 4:03 pm
Earlier this week, the U.S. [read post]
15 Apr 2017, 12:21 pm
`District courts are required to conduct evidentiary hearings only when a substantial claim is presented and there are disputed issues of material fact that will affect the outcome of the motion.' United States v. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 6:00 am
In last week’s judgment in the case of Bou Malhab v Diffusion Métromedia CMR Inc (2011 SCC 9) the Supreme Court of Canada refused to permit a “class action” for libel by Arabic and Creole speaking Montreal taxi drivers who had been subjected to racist and abusive coments by Andre Arthur, a “shock jock” (turned MP)(pictured right) in the course of a radio broadcast. [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 11:24 am
The commentary on this week’s oral argument in McDonald v. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 2:25 am
R (on the application of Afzal) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 7th June 2023. [read post]
23 Dec 2010, 2:21 am
Holdings v. [read post]
18 Sep 2014, 9:01 pm
Similarly in Pollen v. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 8:08 am
Michelle was a resident and citizen of the United States. [read post]
30 Aug 2014, 3:52 am
”” That amused me because it immediately brought to mind United States v. [read post]
19 Sep 2014, 12:00 am
If such a device existed, it would have broken on Thursday, when the government gave its closing argument in the case of United States of America v. [read post]
17 Apr 2012, 4:07 pm
(United States v. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 1:12 pm
In Douglas v. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 8:13 am
United States, 11-5683, and Hill v. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 9:46 am
The FSIA is the federal law that protects foreign states from lawsuits, and makes foreign sovereign property located in the United States immune from attachment.The plaintiffs argued that Section 1610 of the FSIA makes a "commercial activity" exception by declaring that “[a] foreign state shall not be immune from the jurisdiction of courts … in which rights in property taken in violation of international law are in issue and that property … is… [read post]
