Search for: "B William" Results 4801 - 4820 of 7,363
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Jul 2011, 8:00 pm by Paul Jacobson
We may disclose to parties outside Dropbox files stored in your Dropbox and information about you that we collect when we have a good faith belief that disclosure is reasonably necessary to (a) comply with a law, regulation or compulsory legal request; (b) protect the safety of any person from death or serious bodily injury; (c) prevent fraud or abuse of Dropbox or its users; or (d) to protect Dropbox’s property rights. [read post]
2 Jul 2011, 4:56 am by Viking
The great Professor Friedman, on his confrontation rights blog has some thoughts and commentary and confrontation issues, some of which involve the recently granted Williams v. [read post]
2 Jul 2011, 4:56 am by Viking
The great Professor Friedman, on his confrontation rights blog has some thoughts and commentary and confrontation issues, some of which involve the recently granted Williams v. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 5:34 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
Federal and state officials announced the arrests at a news conference this afternoon at the Richard B. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 5:34 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
Federal and state officials announced the arrests at a news conference this afternoon at the Richard B. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 7:01 am by Beyond Intractability
Psychologists have repeatedly shown that people who value A over B and B over C still might not value A over C. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 6:57 am by Peter Spiro
(See this from Slate's William Saletan on Koh's apparent argument that the WPR doesn't cover drones.) [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 6:34 am by John Elwood
 The Beer petition argued that the Williams class had been improperly certified under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(b)(2) because the suit was predominantly for money damages, and that dismissal of their suit on preclusion grounds would violate due process. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 7:17 am by Robert Chesney
Command of NATO implicates the WPR via section 8(c), and whether the language of section 8(b) rebuts the 8(c) argument. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 11:00 pm by Michael O'Brien
 As Judge Hamilton explained: Rodriguez claims that his trial counsel provided ineffective assistance of counsel when she failed to adequately investigate and present testimony from numerous additional witnesses who would have supported Rodriguez’s defense [justification of the use of deadly force].In a unique twist, William Foskett, the investigator assigned to Mr. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 4:28 am by Russ Bensing
Cases I never got around to reading… The headnote for the 10th District’s decision in Williams v. [read post]