Search for: "California v. Force" Results 4801 - 4820 of 6,451
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Aug 2011, 4:00 am
California Coastal Commission did not apply to the ordinance where the ordinance did not require Watson to dedicate any portion of his property to either the City's or the public's use. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 2:58 pm by Elie Mystal
Let us know at tips@abovethelaw.com (subject line: “Gregory Berry”).Meanwhile, we all wait with bated breath for the Kasowitz response.GREGORY BERRY — EMAILS SENT TO HIS CLASSMATES AT PENN LAWSubject: The People of the State of California v. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 10:48 am by NFS Esq.
08/18/2011 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA REBECCA HOWELL, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 8:12 am
Still, it's trying to force legitimate businesses to close rather than seeing them as a legitimate source of revenue and a partner in rebuilding the city's economy. [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 6:41 am by Ruthann Robson - Guest
  Moreover, because the state of California refused to defend Proposition 8 in the federal challenge, it was left to the proponents in Perry v. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 6:16 am by Ted Frank
[Kerr @ Volokh; Adler @ Volokh; SCOTUSblog; Florida v. [read post]
14 Aug 2011, 8:54 pm by Anonymous
This is the second post in my series on the July 2011 California Bar Exam. [read post]
14 Aug 2011, 10:23 am by The Legal Blog
"  The definitions of information, public authority, record and right to information in clauses (f), (h), (i) and (j) of section 2 of the RTI Act are extracted below:  "(f) "information" means any material in any form, including records, documents, memos, e-mails, opinions, advices, press releases, circulars, orders, logbooks, contracts, reports, papers, samples, models, data material held in any electronic form and information relating to any private body which can be… [read post]