Search for: "D. Johnson" Results 4801 - 4820 of 5,904
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 May 2022, 9:03 pm by Gary Gensler
I’d like to extend my gratitude to the members of the SEC staff who worked on this rule, including: Sarah ten Siethoff, Brian Johnson, Thoreau Bartmann, Mike Spratt, Sara Cortes, Michelle Beck, Michael Kosoff, Frank Sensenbrenner, Chris Staley, Zeena Abdul-Rahman, Pamela Ellis, Robert Holowka, Amy Miller, Nathan Schuur, Sam Thomas, Elena Stojic, Matthew Williams, Asaf Barouk, and Emily Rowland in the Division of Investment Management; Alex Schiller, Ross Askanazi, Rooholah… [read post]
13 Aug 2010, 4:01 pm by Steve Bainbridge
no7) Lyndon Johnson (14)--ditto5) Benedict Arnold (17)--too low5) Woodrow Wilson (17)--huh? [read post]
9 Jan 2008, 12:51 am
Mary Landrieu (D-LA) Violated Federal Bribery Law01/08/2008 Presidential Executive Order - 13454 (PDF 587 KB)Titled "Adjustments of Certain Rates of Pay"01/08/2008 Presidential Proclamation - 8214 (PDF 3.88 MB)Titled "To Adjust the Rules of Origin Under the United States-Chile Free Trade Agreement and the United States-Singapore Free Trade Agreement"01/08/2008 Statistical Release on Consumer Credit From the Federal Reserve (PDF 15… [read post]
8 Aug 2007, 4:27 am
Crank, Attorney General; Paul Rehurek, Deputy Attorney General; and D. [read post]
31 Oct 2016, 4:30 am by Edith Roberts
At ImmigrationProfBlog, Kevin Johnson discusses the grant in Esquivel-Quintana v. [read post]
26 Jun 2020, 3:47 am by Edith Roberts
” At the ImmigrationProf Blog, Kevin Johnson highlights the immigration cases the court decided this term, as well as those on the docket for October Term 2020. [read post]
7 Dec 2017, 3:57 am by Sam Grice
The alternative here, was investing in R&D; but the young, fast-moving MindMeld was doing a better job1. [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 4:17 am by Edith Roberts
” At The Conversation, Kevin Johnson finds it “telling” that, in Department of Commerce v. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 5:13 pm by INFORRM
Applying an objective test, the instant advertisement sought to obtain information which would be used to try to make changes to society and would fall within sections 321(3)(b), 321(3)(c), 321(3)(d) or 321(3)(f) of the Communications Act  . [read post]