Search for: "DAVIE v. STATE"
Results 4801 - 4820
of 5,708
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jan 2023, 10:18 pm
Unlike the position in some of the State Supreme Courts,[2] leave to serve outside Australia[3] was required before service (FCR r 10.43(2)). [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 2:34 pm
Then, on 5 May 2022, the landlord’s solicitors wrote to Mr B enclosing a section 21 notice and stating ‘we are advised your deposit was returned to you’. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 9:12 pm
V. [read post]
8 Nov 2017, 7:40 am
Co. v. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 4:36 pm
(Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) False marking and patent reform (Patently-O) US Patents Patent marking police strike again - 100 companies now affected by false marking suits (GRAY on Claims) The marking requirement: Here is how the statute has been interpreted (Patently-O) Investigating Patent Law’s presumption of validity - An empirical analysis (Patently-O) Inventors Eye: The Patent Office’s new publication for inventors (Patent Baristas) US Patents –… [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 4:36 pm
(Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) False marking and patent reform (Patently-O) US Patents Patent marking police strike again - 100 companies now affected by false marking suits (GRAY on Claims) The marking requirement: Here is how the statute has been interpreted (Patently-O) Investigating Patent Law’s presumption of validity - An empirical analysis (Patently-O) Inventors Eye: The Patent Office’s new publication for inventors (Patent Baristas) US Patents –… [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 5:12 am
Lee v. [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 5:27 pm
[Week commencing 13 August] Full Fact v Evening Standard, Clause 1, 17/08/2012; Joseph Horner v The Observer, Clause 1, 16/08/2012; Mr Christopher Mackin v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 15/08/2012; Jane Hughes v The Independent on Sunday, Clause 1, 15/08/2012; Dr Yannis Alexandrides v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 15/08/2012; Mr Oliver Gray v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 15/08/2012; Alex Jarvis v Daily Mail, Clauses 3, 5, 15/08/2012; Inspired Thinking Group… [read post]
27 May 2012, 5:42 pm
UN member states asked the UK about ‘super-injunctions’, online freedom of expression and the defamation bill: “The UK’s representative at the review, Lord McNally, responded to the questions and recommendations regarding defamation and its impact on freedom of expression by stating that ‘his baby’ aimed to get the balance right between a free media and the right of the individual to privacy, and that it was regarded as a ‘good law’… [read post]
1 Apr 2016, 1:33 pm
Read the warning from the State Department here. [read post]
6 May 2013, 5:38 am
On 29 and 30 April 2013, the Court of Appeal (Master of the Rolls, Tomlinson and Ryder LJJ) heard the appeal in the case of AAA v Associated Newspapers (an appeal from the decision of Nicola Davies J, [2012] EWHC 2224 (QB)). [read post]
21 May 2017, 4:41 pm
United States Blog Law Online has a post dealing with the question “Is journalism harassment? [read post]
25 Oct 2012, 7:52 pm
In the Oracle v. [read post]
10 Jun 2016, 6:15 am
Sandler, Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP, on Thursday, June 9, 2016 Tags: Antitakeover, Boards of Directors, Charter & bylaws, Classified boards, Forum selection, IPOs, Majority voting,Ownership structure, Public firms, Shareholder elections, Shareholder voting, Staggered boards, Surveys, Takeover defenses [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 10:39 am
Shaft, Implementing the settlement of State of North Dakota v. [read post]
10 Oct 2021, 4:12 pm
United States A new privacy bill is pending in Massachusetts would be the most revolutionary data-privacy legislation in the United States. [read post]
11 Apr 2023, 3:48 am
” The memo has become the basis for Republican lawmakers accusing the FBI of developing an anti-Catholic bias in the wake of last year’s Supreme Court decision overturning Roe v. [read post]
23 Jul 2015, 2:20 pm
United States v. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 10:03 am
Supreme Court in Decker v. [read post]
29 Sep 2013, 5:07 pm
A woman v Hemel Hempstead Gazette, 10.9.13. [read post]
