Search for: "Doe v. Superior Court" Results 4801 - 4820 of 8,636
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jul 2010, 11:58 am by R. Grace Rodriguez, Esq.
"AN EXAMINATION OF MABRY VINDICATES POINTS MADE IN PLAINTIFFS ORIGINAL COMPLAINT SUCH THAT ALLEGATIONS NEED NOT BE CHANGED.There is a temptation to read Mabry v Superior Court (Aurora) loosely (that it permits contact  subsequent to the NOD which would somehow cure the requirements of the contact to take place within the statutory 30 days or more before the NOD is recorded). [read post]
28 Jul 2020, 6:45 am by DONALD SCARINCI
The Washington Superior Court rejected that claim, and the State Supreme Court affirmed, relying on Ray v. [read post]
7 May 2018, 9:01 am by Jeff Welty
The State Bar determined that the Act – which does not expressly set forth who may seek a court order – does not “provide an exception for a law enforcement officer to file a motion with the court for these records after charges are pending. [read post]