Search for: "Doe v. Superior Court"
Results 4801 - 4820
of 8,624
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Aug 2013, 5:00 am
Superior Court (Cal. [read post]
1 Aug 2013, 10:54 am
“While the jurisdiction to control court processes and function as a court of law gives courts the power to appoint amici curiae, it does not, in itself, provide the power to determine what the Attorney General must pay them. [read post]
1 Aug 2013, 6:45 am
(Eugene Volokh) I recently read an interesting tort case, Stephens v. [read post]
1 Aug 2013, 4:57 am
Shahar v. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 2:01 pm
Calling this “strict liability” (which doesn’t exist in Pennsylvania, although it does in other states), the Superior Court held that Bartlettleft this open. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 12:31 pm
In Lee v. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 6:34 am
, Seaford Court Estates Ltd v. [read post]
29 Jul 2013, 2:54 pm
In reaching this decision, the court relied heavily on Doe v. [read post]
29 Jul 2013, 5:15 am
He moved to dismiss the charges for lack of venue and the Superior Court of Clayton County granted the motion. [read post]
28 Jul 2013, 8:57 am
In the context of an FLSA examination, however, this division of control does not help the nurses’ independent contractor argument because control of the work does not shift to the nurses, it shifts to another entity (which may thereby become a joint employer, Antenor v. [read post]
26 Jul 2013, 9:06 am
By David RangavizIn re Kimmick, 2013 VT 43Today’s case is about the scope of the right to counsel.This year marks the fiftieth anniversary of the Supreme Court’s opinion in Gideon v. [read post]
25 Jul 2013, 12:49 pm
O'Neill v. [read post]
24 Jul 2013, 8:16 pm
This is to ensure compliance with the supreme court's decision in County of Riverside v. [read post]
24 Jul 2013, 8:12 pm
My initial reaction to the question "Does the depublication of a case by the California Supreme Court constitute a 'change in law?'" [read post]
24 Jul 2013, 2:47 pm
Superior Court (2009) 172 Cal.App.4th 1462.) [read post]
23 Jul 2013, 9:01 pm
In this column, I will consider the arguments for and against considering sexual surrogacy to be ethically distinct from, and superior to, prostitution. [read post]
23 Jul 2013, 9:04 am
Hart In Citizens for Ceres v. [read post]
18 Jul 2013, 9:01 pm
The Court in Ballew v. [read post]
16 Jul 2013, 3:26 pm
Does the word "blackmail" (or the more technical legal word, "extortion") come to anyone's mind? [read post]
16 Jul 2013, 11:00 am
A decision by the Quebec Superior Court to authorize a class action to go ahead against Apple Inc. may have set the bar to a new low for certification by not first sorting out whether downloading free apps deliberately breached the privacy of users.In Gad Albilia v. [read post]
