Search for: "ENGLISH v. STATE"
Results 4801 - 4820
of 7,368
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Mar 2010, 3:41 pm
The inability of the RSPB to provide such an undertaking in damages led to the unfortunate consequence in the case of R. v Secretary of State for the Environment Ex p. [read post]
1 Jun 2024, 10:13 am
This article considers the position as to proof of foreign law in the English courts in light of the case of FS Nile Plaza v Brownlie [2021] UKSC 45 and the 11th edition of the Commercial Court Guide. [read post]
13 May 2022, 2:02 pm
See United States v. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 11:25 am
State of Haryana, (1993) 3 SCC 114, at page 120, this Court stated the importance of consistent opinions in achieving harmony in Judicial System:"10. [read post]
14 Oct 2019, 5:00 am
” Gompers v United States, 233 U.S. 604, 610 (1914). [read post]
13 Jun 2022, 10:03 pm
United States. [read post]
20 Feb 2010, 2:31 am
In this connection, a recent judgment of the Court of Appeal in Secretary of State v. [read post]
22 Sep 2010, 6:36 pm
In the classic English case of Pearce v. [read post]
2 Feb 2007, 6:52 am
Electoral Commission.
Essay on the Principles of Circumstantial Evidence Illustrated by Numerous Cases
5th English ed. 1 v. (1905)
Wills, William; Wills, Alfred (Editor); Beers, George Emerson (Editor); Corbin, Arthur Linton (Editor)
French Law and Practice of Patents for Inventions, Improvements, and Importations
From the Paris ed. 1 v. (1834) Perpigna, Antoine
Index and Legislative History Uniform Code… [read post]
21 Jan 2012, 10:20 pm
’s remark that the Duke of Westminster is not good law is incorrect even as a matter of English law. [read post]
23 Jun 2022, 1:59 am
He went on to find that earlier pages in the sales process, including the full product details page, also targeted the UK, not least because that page stated “This item ships to the United Kingdom”. [read post]
19 Aug 2011, 10:25 am
State v. [read post]
4 Aug 2015, 7:44 am
Supreme Court’s recent decision in Texas Department of Housing & Community Affairs v. [read post]
4 Aug 2015, 7:25 pm
Further, the Supreme Court stated that “[g]overnmental or private policies are not contrary to the disparate-impact requirement unless they are artificial, arbitrary, and unnecessary barriers. [read post]
20 Jan 2019, 4:05 pm
Butt v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 17 October 2018 (Underhill V-P, Sharp LJ and Sir Rupert Jackson). [read post]
15 May 2018, 7:14 am
”The Ohio Supreme Court in Koprivec v. [read post]
15 May 2018, 7:14 am
”The Ohio Supreme Court in Koprivec v. [read post]
24 Aug 2020, 1:37 pm
Below is a short description of each case: State of Washington v. [read post]
30 Nov 2007, 7:02 am
There are concerns: In rural areas, it is still difficult to access health services and non-English speaking communities have difficulty obtaining adequate information in their own language. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 5:46 am
District Court in United States v. [read post]
