Search for: "Good v. State of California"
Results 4801 - 4820
of 7,503
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Nov 2024, 2:33 pm
California (9th Cir. 2019) (finding that the anti-commandeering principle protected a California law limiting the cooperation of state and local law enforcement officers with federal immigration authorities); McHenry County v. [read post]
29 Jan 2019, 9:08 am
Still, we have a pretty good idea of which cases will be relisted. [read post]
16 Jul 2015, 9:01 pm
To be sure, Obamacare subsidies in federal-exchange states were taking place before the Court affirmed their validity in King v. [read post]
16 Oct 2020, 12:08 pm
Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan endorsed this approach, noting that, in the 1991 decision California v. [read post]
10 Oct 2014, 7:54 am
The Ninth Circuit’s opinion in PhRMA v. [read post]
15 Mar 2019, 12:46 pm
There is a case pending under California state law, but so far nothing really appears to have come out of all those allegations, and they won't even be part of the big San Diego case. [read post]
21 Apr 2008, 9:54 am
North Carolina, Tennessee and California have initiated studies of their death penalty systems. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 11:01 am
In its recent opinion in Bullcoming v. [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 4:11 pm
That included State v. [read post]
25 Mar 2020, 10:41 am
United States, 19-6113, and Bazan v. [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 6:30 am
[1] Tom Ginsburg & Mila Versteeg, From Catalonia to California: Secession in Constitutional Law, 70 Ala. [read post]
8 Oct 2010, 10:33 am
” Yesterday’s People v. [read post]
20 Jan 2008, 10:32 am
I told him about the seminal California case of Playboy v. [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 7:21 am
California, 13-494, is literally straight outta Compton. [read post]
23 Sep 2009, 8:57 am
Opinion below (11th Circuit) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Petitioner's reply Brief amici curiae of Public Good and the Center for Constitutional Rights Docket: 08-1358 Title: Holmes v. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 12:58 pm
U.S. asylum officers are in the main dedicated and capable, but judicial review of asylum decisions at the U.S. border is exceedingly limited—limits that the Supreme Court upheld on June 25 in Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
21 May 2015, 9:01 pm
U.S.), and the second is a case about how readily a State can discriminate among messages on personalized automobile license plates (Walker v. [read post]
28 May 2024, 1:25 pm
For example, he was the brainchild behind the Obamacare challenge that became known as California v. [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 7:00 am
§1119, 1121 The ability to rule on good faith settlements. [read post]
