Search for: "IN RE THE RULES OF CONTINUING LEGAL"
Results 4801 - 4820
of 15,745
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Dec 2016, 4:30 am
If they think animals should have the right of copyright they're free, I think, under the Constitution, to do that. [read post]
2 Jul 2008, 11:49 pm
Judge Leon ruled that the detainees could get no relief in habeas, Judge Green found the captives had at least a due process claim against their continued confinement. [read post]
3 Mar 2012, 6:57 pm
In Re: Micromet, Inc. [read post]
6 Apr 2022, 10:14 pm
We're ready to go. [read post]
26 Jan 2012, 4:51 pm
The Commission quotes a survey which found that 70% of European citizens are worried about misuse of their personal data, and the effect of the new rules seems broadly to be a re-balancing in favour of the interests and rights of the data subject over those of data controllers and processors. [read post]
27 Jan 2022, 9:03 pm
Legal scholars posit that the changed composition of the court since 2016 means that the court could now rule differently on the constitutionality of the use of race as a factor in admissions processes. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 12:24 pm
Both victims here suffered second degree burns, the news said, but they’re expected to be okay. [read post]
15 Sep 2020, 10:02 am
The federal judiciary — at least in principle — is our government’s best hope to protect the rights of the systemically oppressed.Many recent legal rulings on important matters of public health have fallen short. [read post]
7 Apr 2013, 8:34 am
Why do they continue to do this? [read post]
29 Nov 2021, 6:24 pm
As professional legal marketers, we’re seeing them, every day (the absurd results, not the cringing contortionists). [read post]
25 Nov 2008, 9:17 am
Surprisingly, despite constant requests by criminal defense attorneys to argue nullification to juries continuing even to the present (and trial courts’ constant rulings prohibiting such arguments), the United States Supreme Court has not revisited the issue of jury nullification in nearly 100 years, despite an extensive overhaul of most of the legal ideology upon which the Sparf opinion was based. [read post]
21 Nov 2013, 7:14 am
But we’re gradually beginning to see the full scope of the FISA Court’s inadequacy as an oversight institution. [read post]
30 Sep 2020, 1:03 pm
If you're a California appellate lawyer, you need to sign up for CLA's Appellate Summit here! [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 12:26 pm
In re Trulia, Inc. [read post]
28 Jan 2016, 6:47 am
Do you think you’re depressed, sir? [read post]
22 Oct 2012, 10:05 am
In one of these cases, In re Sunnyslope Housing Limited Partnership, Case No. 2:11-cv-02579 (D. [read post]
21 Jan 2021, 9:54 am
They’re excluded. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 3:00 am
Josh King: The biggest concern with any of these rules, and again, it’s not the ABA so much as it is when they promulgate the rules than they’re implemented at the state level, is that the legal industry is self-regulating at the state level. [read post]
20 Mar 2014, 12:51 pm
The appeals court ruled that of the 30 works by Mr. [read post]
8 Jun 2018, 10:18 am
The site’s “Rules” section makes it crystal clear that the site doesn’t “endorse or condone” the sharing of copyrighted materials without permission, and mandates that users should only share files that they are legally allowed to share. [read post]
