Search for: "Kat"
Results 4801 - 4820
of 6,638
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Mar 2012, 6:40 am
Thanks to blogmeister Jeremy as well for his assistance to this Kat. [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 5:53 am
Unfortunately, this Kat could not see any official statement on the Home Office website. [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 8:59 pm
HT @xiaosongbird” -> Non-performing loan ratio to increase http://t.co/TKnGnV5g -> Bloomberg: China Cutting Health-Care Costs Threatens Drugmaker Profits http://t.co/SS9wO4Xm -> Reuters: Politics push China's property tax toward Beijing http://t.co/fFB0vApF -> China Beat: The First Asian Man: The Story Behind the Jeremy Lin Story http://t.co/yej8c8mg -> Diplomat: China’s Libya Problem http://t.co/XthIT95i -> Global Times: Panels may judge medical disputes… [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 2:35 pm
This Kat has always been too short to have a devastating impact on the basketball court. [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 9:06 am
He has however been deluged with texts, tweets, emails, indeed practically everything except messages via carrier pigeon [you don't put a pigeon among the Kats, says Merpel] over the news, reported on the BBC among other places, that a popular Portswood (Southampton) pub and music venue by the name of The Hobbit has been threatened with legal action by US movie lawyers representing the Saul Zaentz Company (SZC) in California. [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 4:39 am
Update, 13 March, 11.37am: a katpat to Simon Malynicz (3 New Square), who has emailed the Kat as follows: "The main point to note is the new e-Curia service, which allows documents to be lodged in Luxembourg electronically without the need to provide them by post or courier. [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 4:02 am
The Kat thanks Tamar for telling his readers about this. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 10:16 am
" Skydive litigants crash-land in court", here, this being a case note on a copyright scrap over the ownership of a jointly owned film; * "Google and the Law", here -- announcing the publication of a new book, with two Kat contributions, on Google's various business operations and their legality; * "Patents: dead, broken -- or just not working perfectly? [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 9:12 am
Currently without a wristwatch, this Kat has discovered how sociable it can be to discover what the time is by asking everyone around if they can kindly tell him. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 4:17 am
Unlike some of her work colleagues (you know who you are), this Kat does not drink Coca-Cola or Pepsi. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 1:52 am
In case you've not been checking the Forthcoming Events page as often as you might, the Kat takes this opportunity to remind you of three reduced rate offers that are available to his readers: 3 to 4 April 2012: "U.S. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 1:24 am
However, the consequences of his decision may be fairly drastic for the defendant, and that could be said to be an argument in favour of granting permission [The fact that the consequences may be drastic seems to this Kat to be something that generally works in favour of infringers and other villains, rather for for IP owners. [read post]
9 Mar 2012, 4:39 am
This reminds this chemical Kat of a story he heard when he was at Oxford. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 5:21 am
This Kat had no business being awake at 3:00 am. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 4:45 am
This Kat tends to rate the prospects of it succeeding considerably below strategy 2 above, and accordingly he tends not to argue based on USPTO allowance for fear that it will result in one of two reactions from the EPO examiner: "Yes, we're all very happy to hear about your success before the USPTO, but you see we have this big problem with D1 and D3 -- they render claim 1 obvious. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 12:29 am
As some readers know, one of this Kat's research interests is in the ins and outs of digital copyright. [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 4:47 pm
Also, in dismissing an appeal against Floyd J’s finding of non-obviousness, Sir Robin Jacob and Kitchin LJ, who wrote jointly for the Court of Appeal, picked up a new (to this Kat) description of obviousness: “This invention was not ob via – in the way” [73]. [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 4:43 pm
From one of the IPKat's readers comes a request for information which requires some crowd-sourcing Kat-style. [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 4:47 am
This Kat hasn't yet had a chance to absorb fully the analysis of this morning's decision, but he confesses that he was very much persuaded by the decision of Judge Birss QC when he first read it -- so he'll have to read Mann J's judgment carefully to see where he went wrong. [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 2:58 am
There are loads of statistics on view, and names of companies and countries too, for those who (like this Kat) enjoy reading them. [read post]
