Search for: "MATTER OF RULES OF EVIDENCE" Results 4801 - 4820 of 42,203
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Oct 2010, 12:54 pm by PaulKostro
Rule of Evidence, 611(c) addresses the propriety of leading questions: Leading questions should not be used on the direct examination of a witness except as may be necessary to develop the witness testimony. [read post]
17 Jan 2011, 11:48 am by John L. Welch
Here is a compilation of the TTAB's precedential opinions/decisions for the calendar year 2010, categorized according to subject matter. [read post]
15 Jun 2016, 9:27 am by Neumann Law Group
Michigan Appeals Court Rules for Electric Company in Case Related to Injuries Resulting From Power Shutoff, Neumann Law Group, May 10, 2016. [read post]
16 Dec 2019, 9:08 am by Thorsten Bausch
Although there are some notable exceptions to this, parties currently have some flexibility in bringing new requests, facts, objections, arguments and evidence on appeal. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 4:26 am by David DePaolo
"As Commissioner Sweeney pointed out, those too could potentially involve substantive issues that affect legal rights, but that is not an opinion held by the ruling majority.So, for the time being at least, medical control over cases that are procedurally efficient (in other words, where timeliness of request or review is not in question) rests with the employer/defense community.There are going to be individual tragedy cases, and there are going to be cases where treatment isn't… [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 10:31 am by Bexis
  Maybe later, once all the facts are in, this could be ruled on as a matter of law, but not yet. [read post]
16 Sep 2013, 3:34 am by Peter Mahler
Justice DeStefano’s Ruling Justice DeStefano’s analysis initially discusses several appellate opinions that “appear, at first glance, to support Silverberg’s contention that evidence of bad faith is not relevant to the issue of dissension and deadlock amongst two 50% shareholders. [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 3:08 pm by Bryan West
The Court noted that expert evidence is presumptively inadmissible, and is only allowed where impartial advice on factual matters not within the court’s general experience will play a role in the analysis. [read post]
4 Mar 2013, 3:23 pm by Robert Bernstein
Rule 408 generally bars admission into evidence of settlement communications. [read post]
28 Jan 2016, 5:11 pm
See also Matter of Warburg, 38 Misc.2d 997, 237 N.Y.S.2d 557; Matter of Hammer, 33 Misc.2d 67 [read post]
3 May 2014, 10:44 am by Andrew Delaney
Evidence is viewed in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 3:38 am by John L. Welch
It ruled that indirect evidence of materiality is acceptable in an inter partes proceeding, and it concluded that “a significant portion of consumers of cigars would be materially influenced by the geographic meaning of applicant’s mark. [read post]
16 Mar 2015, 7:00 am
 [Colorado Rule of Evidence (“CRE”)] 901(a); see People v. [read post]
8 Sep 2010, 6:37 pm by Lyle Denniston
The majority’s broadest holding was that a court rule that supposedly focuses only on whether specific evidence is to be excluded as a trial proceeds can actually be used to end a case before it goes beyond its mere filing and no disputes had yet arisen over what would be allowed in or kept out. [read post]