Search for: "Marks v. State "
Results 4801 - 4820
of 21,686
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Sep 2020, 3:02 pm
In New York v. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 3:58 am
C. v. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 11:36 am
See Knight Textile Corp. v. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 11:36 am
See Knight Textile Corp. v. [read post]
5 Oct 2018, 8:00 am
Facts: This case (Goode v. [read post]
16 May 2022, 2:15 pm
In Israel v. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 1:24 pm
The Supreme Court heard the landmark appeal, Thaler v Comptroller-General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks [2023], after it was initially dismissed in the High Court and Court of Appeal in 2021. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 6:59 pm
Lesniak v. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 8:01 am
On Monday the United States Supreme Court issued a 5-4 decision in Arizona State Legislature v. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 11:08 pm
Ct. 876, 905 (2010) (internal quotation marks omitted). [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 11:14 am
. - The opinion in Blackhorse v. [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 3:20 pm
State Comp. [read post]
28 Sep 2016, 9:21 am
Every year, the first Monday in October marks the beginning of a new term. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 10:03 pm
ZERO MEAT v MEAT ZERO Background On 29 September 2021, CPF Food and Beverage Co., Ltd. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 11:53 am
In Boschma v. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 4:38 pm
Doudna states in his supporting affidavit that he did not write, post, or even read that report at the time. [read post]
18 Jul 2008, 4:50 am
Count V: Trademark Infringement - Apple has a bunch of trademarks. [read post]
8 May 2022, 1:43 am
Following a hearing, the Hearing Officer issued decisions upholding the objections.In her decisions (BLO/629/21 and BLO/630/21), the Hearing Officer relied on Case T-795/17 Moreira v EUIPO (NEYMAR), stating that— 'bad faith may be assumed in the event of the lack of a proper explanation by the applicant to rebut certain known facts, which in turn led to inescapable motivations on the part of the applicant and as far as the filing of the trade mark application… [read post]
12 Nov 2021, 2:01 am
Little Hare Gin had not provided any evidence of use in the marketplace or stated whether these brands had registered their marks. [read post]
4 Oct 2013, 5:16 am
See United States v. [read post]
