Search for: "Mays v. State" Results 4801 - 4820 of 119,075
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Apr 2019, 6:49 am by Eric Goldman
She declined, essentially admitting that no additional facts could be alleged that might state her claims under the ATA or state law. [read post]
14 Aug 2019, 7:25 am
Factors to be weighed in the balance Instead, the Irish Supreme Court stated that other factors may be considered and weighed in the balance by a court in considering how matters are to be held most fairly pending a trial and in recognising the possibility that there may be no trial. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 3:56 am
  Given the evidence presented, the jury was completely right in saying that the State did not prove its case beyond a reasonable doubt. [read post]
7 Apr 2009, 10:31 pm
  The Supreme Court ruled Monday that even where a confession is voluntary, it may not be used in federal court if the defendant was held more than six hourse before confessing. [read post]
11 Nov 2010, 1:09 pm by Gene Quinn
On Tuesday, November 9, 2010, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit heard oral arguments in TiVo, Inc. v. [read post]
5 May 2021, 6:25 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Indian Law Section CLE Presented by the Indian Law Section, State Bar of Montana;  With the Criminal Law Section, State Bar of Montana  Friday, May 7, 2021 (all times MST) Register here: https://www.montanabar.org/events/EventDetails.aspx? [read post]
28 Jul 2022, 10:01 am by Eugene Volokh
U.S. (1935) (although a prosecutor "may strike hard blows, [she] is not at liberty to strike foul ones"); U.S. v. [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 4:15 am by Howard Friedman
In Ohio District Council, Inc. of the Assemblies of God v. [read post]
2 Aug 2016, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
The Church and the priest appealed, but in a 2-1 decision in Mayeux v. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 7:42 am by Beth Graham
(Our discussion of the case may be read here.) [read post]
17 Sep 2011, 6:00 am by PaulKostro
Both New Jersey and Pennsylvania have adopted the following provision: “A tribunal of this State may not modify any aspect of a child support order that may not be modified under the law of the issuing state. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 5:30 am by Joshua Matz
Today’s petition of the day is: Title: KFC Corp. v. [read post]