Search for: "One (1) Machine"
Results 4801 - 4820
of 8,034
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Sep 2012, 8:27 am
Cognitive Bias: In many multi-component cases, the correct royalty rate will be <<1% of the market value [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 3:00 am
(One talk at the latest Camp set a new goal for the CCC: Put a hacker on the moon by 2034.) [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 5:54 pm
There is a bar to premising one inference upon another as a basis for conviction. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 8:15 am
Rev. 447, 447-454 (May 2012). http://digitalcommons.law.ggu.edu/ggulrev/vol42/iss3/6/Terry Wohlers, Additive Manufacturing 101: Part 1, Wholers Associates (Jan. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 7:00 am
Moreover, these relationships were essentially fixed in perpetuity; that is, one was (in theory) always inferior to one’s ancestors and superior to one’s descendants. [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 9:32 am
Additional Requirements For Employee Authorization In (1). [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 12:30 am
This machine is accomplished by two main machines viz (1) Remote enemy sensatory and killing machine. (2) Remote missile and RDX, explosive, bombs, petrochemicals, gas etc. sensatory and destroying machine remained from the finite or infinite distance of the target".This Kat is just off now to take a look at the prior art ... [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 5:09 pm
The report of Part 1 of the Leveson Inquiry will be published this Autumn. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 7:04 am
In relevant part for the issues at hand, Article 33 of the Montreal Convention provides as follows: (1) An action for damages must be brought, at the option of the plaintiff, in the territory of one of the States Parties, either before the court of the domicile of the carrier or of its principal place of business, or where it has a place of business through which the contract has been made or before the court at the place of destination [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 7:04 am
In relevant part for the issues at hand, Article 33 of the Montreal Convention provides as follows: (1) An action for damages must be brought, at the option of the plaintiff, in the territory of one of the States Parties, either before the court of the domicile of the carrier or of its principal place of business, or where it has a place of business through which the contract has been made or before the court at the place of destination [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 6:45 am
She is the author of the #1 selling book on cost containment, Workers Compensation Management Program: Reduce Costs 20% to 50%. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 4:42 am
They are designed to ensure that humans, rather than machines and automated devices, post ads. . . . [read post]
9 Sep 2012, 6:27 pm
The issues, as I see them are: 1. [read post]
9 Sep 2012, 5:01 pm
This requirement is not satisfied when the claimed invention as such does not have a technical contribution to the prior art or when the technical contribution is nothing but a solution that is obvious to the skilled person.[2.1] The invention according to claim 1 concerns a method for generating at least one project reference model defining project and process requirements and their control in a machine-readable way (see the claim wording). [read post]
8 Sep 2012, 9:00 am
Section 1(b) of Pub. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 1:24 pm
To steal ideas from one person is plagiarism. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 12:53 pm
The claim reads as follows: 1. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 12:20 pm
There is a waiver process, but it takes up to a year to be approved if you spent even one day in jail, as Eggers did during the Kennedy Administration. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 8:15 am
What the police must prove in such a hearing is (1) the officer had reasonable suspicion or probable cause to pull the suspect over and (2) the officer had probable cause to arrest the suspect. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 6:21 am
[Continued from yesterday's Part 2 and the preceding Part 1.] [read post]
