Search for: "Parks v. State"
Results 4801 - 4820
of 10,155
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 May 2019, 10:15 am
The petition maintains that the Court has said (in Chadbourne & Parke LLP v. [read post]
6 Feb 2013, 12:59 pm
Staples v. [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 8:22 am
EME Homer City[1] and Seventh, United States v. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 11:25 am
Allied Stores Int’l, Inc., as well as by the United States Supreme Court’s 1980 decision in Pruneyard Shopping Center v. [read post]
21 Mar 2025, 6:00 am
NYCERS rationally relied on the alternative payroll code appearing in the relevant time and attendance records, by which NYCERS effected the pension withdrawals and which does not appear on the Official List, to conclude that these additional withdrawals were erroneous (see also Matter of Adirondack Wild: Friends of the Forest Preserve v New York State Adirondack Park Agency, [*2]34 NY3d 184, 195 [2019]). [read post]
21 Mar 2025, 6:00 am
NYCERS rationally relied on the alternative payroll code appearing in the relevant time and attendance records, by which NYCERS effected the pension withdrawals and which does not appear on the Official List, to conclude that these additional withdrawals were erroneous (see also Matter of Adirondack Wild: Friends of the Forest Preserve v New York State Adirondack Park Agency, [*2]34 NY3d 184, 195 [2019]). [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 10:40 am
The majority likened a state’s program of issuing specialty or “vanity” plates to much the same kind of government activity as choosing which message-conveying monuments to allow in a public park. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 8:47 am
As the Supreme Court explained in State v. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 11:21 am
In the case of Silver v. [read post]
8 Mar 2009, 3:33 am
Agency [v. [read post]
9 Sep 2007, 6:49 pm
Per Ford Motor Credit Co. v. [read post]
23 Sep 2018, 9:50 am
Henry v. [read post]
31 Oct 2022, 11:40 pm
I've now had a chance to review the oral argument in the Students for Fair Admission v. [read post]
8 Apr 2014, 8:02 am
§285), and numerous states have taken action against NPE's as well. [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 3:44 pm
See People v Grandadam. [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 5:34 pm
For example, in People v. [read post]
5 Aug 2014, 6:30 am
In Clark v. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 5:23 am
The case is Hill v. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 5:23 am
The case is Hill v. [read post]
19 Oct 2021, 6:54 am
In 2014, the Court affirmed the "coincide" requirement in Chadbourne & Parke LLP v. [read post]
