Search for: "Plaintiff(s)"
Results 4801 - 4820
of 178,514
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Sep 2020, 1:26 pm
In an opinion originally filed on August 26, and later certified for publication on September 16, 2020, the Third District Court of Appeal dismissed a plaintiff group’s (“Parkford”) appeal from an adverse judgment in a CEQA/land use case as moot. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 2:37 pm
However, this did not explain defendant's failure to maintain a safe distance from plaintiff's vehicle, and therefore was not enough to rebut the presumption that no negligence on plaintiff's part contributed to the Dicturel v Dukureh, 71 AD3d 558 (1st Dept. 2010). [read post]
30 Mar 2007, 5:32 am
Levinson adopted the fraud-on-the-market theory that can replace the specific and individual reliance requirement in certain situations. [2] Under the fraud-on-the-market theory, reliance is presumed if the plaintiff can show the efficiency of the market and public and material misrepresentation made by the defendant. [3] Since the market is efficient, the prices in the market reflect the defendant's publicly made misrepresentation. [4] The fraud-on-the-market theory thus… [read post]
15 Feb 2023, 6:11 am
That's the rule in Darnell v. [read post]
16 Feb 2007, 12:08 pm
Plaintiff's lawyer in the two Delaware actions filed a motion with the Judicial Panel for Multidistrict Litigation (MDL) requesting centralization of the class actions pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407 in the District of Delaware. [read post]
11 Sep 2008, 5:07 am
It's worth bookmarking in case you ever run into someone who says, "You know, it's a shame Dickie... [read post]
26 May 2014, 9:34 pm
Donaca’s own example suggests the contrary. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 9:00 am
The medical negligence suit contends that Safeway pharmacists negligently dispensed methadone and another medication to the plaintiff’s now-dead wife even though using the drugs together is risky, ultimately leading to her death. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 9:00 am
The medical negligence suit contends that Safeway pharmacists negligently dispensed methadone and another medication to the plaintiff’s now-dead wife even though using the drugs together is risky, ultimately leading to her death. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 9:00 am
The medical negligence suit contends that Safeway pharmacists negligently dispensed methadone and another medication to the plaintiff’s now-dead wife even though using the drugs together is risky, ultimately leading to her death. [read post]
28 Jan 2016, 7:40 pm
The District Court sided with Triton, finding that the plaintiff was W&T’s invitee and W&T appealed to the Fifth Circuit. [read post]
14 Aug 2016, 12:00 am
On the other hand, plaintiff’s need for the discovery at this time is practically nonexistent. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 3:00 am
Plaintiff's medical bills were $12,000. [read post]
13 Sep 2016, 9:59 am
However, the plaintiff does have the initial burden to prove that a contradiction exists. [read post]
3 Apr 2020, 5:00 am
.), the court found that where a trial court entered a judgment of non pros due to a Plaintiff’s failure to prosecute her suit and the Plaintiff thereafter failed to file a Petition to Open the Judgment before appealing, the Plaintiff waived the single issue raised on appeal. [read post]
15 Oct 2019, 5:30 am
.), the court struck the entry of a default judgment against the Defendant after finding that the Plaintiff’s notice of default was fatally defective because it failed to contain the specificity required by the Pennsylvania Rules of Civil Procedure. [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 1:05 pm
Supreme Court determined that Alabama’s redistricting map, adopted for the 2022 congressional elections, likely violated Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act. [read post]
16 Apr 2009, 8:32 pm
In coverage of today's ruling, at BNA's "E-Commerce and Tech Law Blog," Thomas O'Toole had a post titled "Fourth Circuit's Turnitin.com Ruling Brings More Trouble for Plaintiffs. [read post]
24 Feb 2016, 6:49 am
In closing, [plaintiff's] counsel reminded the jury that [plaintiff's former employee/defendant's executive] saw [plaintiff's] Infinity System press release and sent it around at [defendant]; [defendant] acquired an Infinity communicating system and tore it down; and [plaintiff's former employee] took documents from [plaintiff]. [read post]
25 Jan 2021, 3:19 pm
The post District Court Grants Motion for Summary Judgment for Lack of Marking Where Plaintiff Marked Packaging with Patent Numbers But Not the Product Itself appeared first on Patent Lawyer Blog. [read post]
