Search for: "Powers v. Powers" Results 4801 - 4820 of 55,708
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jan 2007, 7:07 am
Solicitor General to offer the government's views on state power to regulate the commercial delivery of tobacco or other products harmful to children. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 1:00 pm by Jane Chong
Petitioner Ali al-Bahlul filed his reply brief yesterday in Bahlul v. [read post]
30 Oct 2011, 9:47 am
" As emerging technologies upend societal expectations of privacy, some legal experts point to People v. [read post]
2 Apr 2024, 7:28 am by Unknown
According to the complaint, without the relief sought, the firm faces severe penalties and lacks the opportunity for pre-enforcement judicial review, leaving them with the dilemma of complying with an unconstitutional demand or risking their business's future (John Doe Corporation v. [read post]
29 May 2020, 12:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Auth. v Transport Workers' Union of Am., Local 100, AFL-CIO, 6 NY3d 332, the court explained that such an award may not be vacated on the ground that the arbitrator exceeded his or her power unless it violates a strong public policy, is irrational, or clearly exceeds a specifically enumerated limitation of the arbitrator's power. [read post]
7 Jun 2020, 12:04 pm by Charles (Chuck) Rubin
" The Trust Code also includes other provisions specifically granting powers of removal to the court. [read post]
17 May 2016, 8:59 am by WIMS
Court of Appeals Rules that Clean Power Plan Will Remain in Effect - State of West Virginia, et al. v. [read post]
10 Jan 2023, 11:54 am
The more cinéma vérité, the better, as far as I'm concerned. [read post]
8 Apr 2018, 7:15 am by Ilya Somin
Right-wing defenders of the administration are arguing for sweeping notions of federal power, including by relying on a broad interpretation of Arizona v. [read post]
29 May 2020, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Auth. v Transport Workers' Union of Am., Local 100, AFL-CIO, 6 NY3d 332, the court explained that such an award may not be vacated on the ground that the arbitrator exceeded his or her power unless it violates a strong public policy, is irrational, or clearly exceeds a specifically enumerated limitation of the arbitrator's power. [read post]