Search for: "State v. C. S. S. B."
Results 4801 - 4820
of 15,316
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Oct 2010, 2:10 pm
The Court of Appeal was asked to consider the case on the basis that: a) SO was an asylum seeker, rather than a failed asylum seeker b) SO was now 20, rather than 23 as thr AIT had found - the AIT's decision not being conclusive (R(A) v Croydon LBC: R(M) v Lambeth LBC [2009] 1 WLR 2557 ) c) The Court was to ignore the fact that SO was receiving education and training as set out in his pathway plan. [read post]
24 May 2019, 3:01 pm
Jorge C. [read post]
17 Jun 2021, 9:00 am
As to the defendant’s forfeiture of her right to counsel, the court discussed State v. [read post]
23 May 2016, 5:10 am
Zauderer v. [read post]
14 Aug 2015, 6:07 am
Code § [3553(a)(1), (2)(B)-(D)]. [read post]
17 Apr 2021, 11:11 am
Toro v. [read post]
11 May 2013, 10:35 pm
The plaintiff’s primary grievance was with regard to the content of the advertisement that allegedly stated the following – "Fortune RBO oil as being, (a) the "healthiest oil in the world"; (b) healthier than the other cooking oils shown in the advertisements (in the TV commercial, though the trademark of the plaintiff was not used, comparison was made with the container of the plaintiff’s product. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 1:33 pm
So if A delegates to B the power to manage A’s farm for five years, B could lease part of the farm to C for a few years, but B could not sell the farm. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 6:36 am
Quantum computing; b. artificial intelligence; c. precision medicine; d. diagnostic methods; e. pharmaceutical treatments; and f. other computer-related inventions (e.g. [read post]
11 Jun 2010, 10:47 am
Application of State v. [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 8:21 am
Each of the following is a separate, chargeable violation of the NYCHRL: a) Failing to disclose to the applicant a written copy of any inquiry an employer conducted into the applicant’s criminal history; b) Failing to share with the applicant a written copy of the employer’s Article 23-A analysis; c) Failing to hold the prospective position open for at least three business days, from an applicant’s receipt of both the inquiry and… [read post]
27 May 2024, 4:00 am
Bank N.A. v. [read post]
7 Jan 2020, 12:31 pm
C-09-05892 JCS, 2010 WL 1340519, at *5 (N.D. [read post]
11 Mar 2015, 4:18 pm
Corrections Act § 306(c). [read post]
11 Mar 2015, 4:18 pm
Corrections Act § 306(c). [read post]
12 May 2015, 10:44 am
That leaves three possible options—that the doctrine is (B) statutory interpretation, (C) judge-made law, or (D) some combination of those two. [read post]
19 Oct 2016, 7:08 am
In U.S. v Nagel the defendant appealed his 292 month sentence imposed after pleading guilty to a charge of enticing a minor to engage in sexual activity in violation of 18 U.S.C. section 2422(b) His appeal centered around the procedural and substantive reasonableness of his sentence specifically whether the district court was correct in not grouping count one and count two of the defendant’s conviction in accordance with section 3D1.2 of the federal sentencing… [read post]
21 Sep 2018, 9:47 am
Bass-v-COTR-Complaint [read post]
8 Oct 2018, 1:14 pm
” See United States v. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 11:58 am
Law Lessons from State v. [read post]
