Search for: "State v. Character"
Results 4801 - 4820
of 7,504
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jul 2008, 3:59 pm
In the Pennsylvania case of Taylor v. [read post]
16 Sep 2014, 9:57 am
However, when considering the effect of a parody, he held that it is a common understanding that a parody must have a somehow humorous effect, and that it is left to (seemingly the courts) Member States to define what is humorous, also depending on different national sensitivities. [read post]
28 May 2020, 12:05 am
Interestingly, although the parties had not argued this, the court suggested it had jurisdiction to hear the case against Nestlé BV's parent company on the basis of the CJEU's decision in C-617/15 Nike v. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 7:23 pm
That is because federal law takes precedence over state laws. [read post]
3 Jan 2014, 1:50 am
Initially the opposition was based on a whole host of grounds, starting with the Trade Marks Act 1996, section 8 on the grounds that BETPACK (i) did not fall within the definition of a trade mark, (ii) was devoid of distinctive character, (iii) consisted exclusively of signs or indications which may designate characteristics of the goods, (iv) was of such a nature as to deceive, (v) was such that its use would be prohibited by enactment or rule of law. [read post]
5 May 2016, 5:05 am
The glyphs used in Klingon are functional, and analogous to typeface designs (which are said in US law to be protectable as industrial designs only, per Adobe Sys. v. [read post]
26 Jan 2022, 6:30 am
And it rightly criticises the separation of powers idea as inapt in the modern administrative state . [read post]
25 Jan 2015, 10:32 am
The first standard applied, the Cronic standard (from the SCOTUS ruling in United States v. [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 5:11 pm
As a result of the Court’s ruling today in California Building Industry Association v. [read post]
23 Feb 2013, 5:10 am
Court of Appeals, Todd Matthew Thomas v. [read post]
8 Jul 2009, 11:05 am
Wahl v. [read post]
9 Aug 2022, 4:11 pm
From Doyle v. [read post]
4 Jun 2009, 8:39 am
In Maryland v. [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 5:11 pm
As a result of the Court’s ruling today in California Building Industry Association v. [read post]
15 Mar 2013, 9:22 am
’” Blouin v. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 11:13 am
In 2010, in Graham v. [read post]
2 Sep 2011, 6:05 am
This balancing of evidence is illustrated in Jake’s Fireworks Inc. v. [read post]
19 Sep 2018, 4:49 pm
Da Vinci Investment, LP v City of Arlington, 2018 WL 4090599 (5th Cir CA 8/27/2018) [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 4:56 am
People v Vera & Magda Realty Corp., 2019 NY Slip Op 32650(U) (N.Y. [read post]
14 Jun 2019, 3:54 pm
East Rockhill Township v. [read post]
