Search for: "State v. Childs" Results 4801 - 4820 of 21,041
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Feb 2011, 7:53 pm by Stephen Page
As but one example of the concerns to which I refer, Ceci and Bruck, presenting the Amicus Brief for the case of State of New Jersey v. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 10:31 am
Category: Recent Decisions;Declaratory Judgment Opinions Body: SC18482 - Raftopol v. [read post]
19 Nov 2010, 4:06 am by traceydennis
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) RT (Zimbabwe) & Ors v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2010] EWCA Civ 1285 (18 November 2010) Whitney v Monster Worldwide Ltd [2010] EWCA Civ 1312 (18 November 2010) Emerald Supplies Ltd & Anor v British Airways Plc [2010] EWCA Civ 1284 (18 November 2010) Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Ali v The Crown [2010] EWCA Crim 2665 (18 November 2010) High Court (Administrative Court) Flattery & Anor… [read post]
24 Sep 2015, 11:28 am by Megen Miller
The plaintiff, by his mother as next friend, had sued the minor child defendant Michael Hand, Hand's foster-care provider, the state of Michigan, DHS, and DHS of Wexford-Missaukee Counties. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 8:41 pm by Heidi Meinzer
  For a wonderful analysis of what the Court did and did not do in Stevens, be sure to catch Matthew Liebman’s post on the Animal Legal Defense Fund Blog, Clarifying the Supreme Court’s United States v. [read post]
24 Mar 2021, 3:26 pm by Unknown
United States (Alaska Native Tribal Health Consortium; FTCA)State Courts Bulletin https://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2021.htmlMoyant v. [read post]
4 Feb 2007, 6:51 am
This summary of facts from a recent case - United States v. [read post]
26 May 2010, 10:01 am by R.J. MacReady
The witness's affidavit was unclear about whether "we went to bed" meant she and Perez or just her and her child, and simply was not the game-changer Perez wished it to be. [read post]
3 Apr 2019, 11:06 am by Unknown
United States (Class Action Settlement Agreement)Peggy Fontenot v. [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 2:23 am by Jeremy Saland
As stated by the court: “For a defendant to be liable under this section [PL 260.10(1)], she ‘must simply be aware that the conduct may likely result in harm to a child.'” People v. [read post]