Search for: "State v. Good Bear" Results 4801 - 4820 of 5,195
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Feb 2009, 4:22 pm
  The odds of that are about as good as the Bears coming home next January with a Lombardi Trophy, but hey, it could happen. [read post]
3 Feb 2009, 4:00 am
>> Plaintiff Bears the Ultimate Burden of Proving Retaliatory MotiveSunderman v. [read post]
3 Feb 2009, 1:48 am
  However, there are innumerable good reasons why a Phd provides advantages to people seeking law school teaching jobs and their numbers have been growing steadily for several decades. [read post]
23 Jan 2009, 6:25 pm
 The Justices' action came without comment and with no noted dissents in Mukasey v. [read post]
22 Jan 2009, 2:06 am
Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 53 Cal.3d 987 (1991), held, "[i]t is only reasonable therefore that as between the injured user and the one who places the product on the market the latter should bear the loss. [read post]
21 Jan 2009, 11:58 pm
In a per curiam summary reversal, the United States Supreme Court held in Spears v. [read post]
16 Jan 2009, 7:00 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com]   Highlights this week included: CAFC: In re Comiskey rehearing en banc falls two votes short; important dissent by Moore J (Hal Wegner) (Inventive Step) (Patently-O) (Washington State Patent Law Blog) (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (Law360) (Patent Prospector) District Court Delaware: Document shredding voids 12 Rambus patents: Rambus v Micron… [read post]
13 Jan 2009, 4:10 am
S 59 Last Act: 01/07/09 referred to ways and meansA160 Budget -- Enacts into law major components of legislation which are necessary to implement the state fiscal plan for the 2009-2010 state fiscal year Same as Uni. [read post]
12 Jan 2009, 3:23 am
  In State v. [read post]
12 Jan 2009, 12:14 am
  Factor that into the decision and see how comfortable you are with advising a defendant to take a plea.Update:  As raised by our Hinterlands correspondent, Kathleen, and showing a fortuitous symmetry, two of today's posts meld perfectly as shown in the Vermont Supreme Court's decision in State v. [read post]
9 Jan 2009, 7:00 am
Volkswagon-based transfer mandamus order in In re TS Tech USA (Inventive Step) (Hal Wegner) (EDTexweblog.com) (EDTexweblog.com) (Washington State Patent Law Blog) (Patently-O) (Law360) (Patent Prospector) ECJ decides Obelix too famous to be confused with MOBILIX mobile phone service: Les Éditions Albert René Sàrl v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market, Orange A/S (Class 46) (IPKat)   Global Global – General Moral… [read post]