Search for: "State v. Hands"
Results 4801 - 4820
of 31,287
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Oct 2014, 2:08 pm
The basis: the challenge fails to present a substantial federal question, under the precedent set by the United States Supreme Court in Baker v. [read post]
16 Jul 2024, 6:00 am
DiNapoli, as State Comptroller, et al., Respondents. [read post]
16 Jul 2024, 6:00 am
DiNapoli, as State Comptroller, et al., Respondents. [read post]
21 Sep 2007, 11:08 am
Applying the Supreme Court's 1990 decision in Employment Division v. [read post]
11 Nov 2007, 2:36 pm
In Case T-374/04 Germany v. [read post]
11 Jun 2014, 12:29 pm
On the other hand, if a non-state actor can be deemed to have launched an “armed attack” within the meaning of the UN Charter, then self-defense rights are triggered. [read post]
24 May 2011, 7:22 am
Yesterday the Supreme Court released its decision in Brown v. [read post]
16 Jun 2009, 9:24 pm
United States v Gowadia, (D. [read post]
1 Nov 2009, 7:00 am
Congress accordingly has imposed "fiduciary duties" on investment companies regulated by the ICA without a clear power to fully opt out of duties as there is for uncorporations under state (i.e., Delaware) law. [read post]
11 Jul 2010, 6:30 am
Bush v. [read post]
22 Dec 2017, 2:43 am
United States and Overton v. [read post]
10 Apr 2018, 2:49 am
United States v. [read post]
11 Feb 2010, 3:31 am
Four years ago in State v. [read post]
5 Dec 2022, 1:59 am
On Wednesday 7th December the Supreme Court will hand down judgment in REFERENCE by the Attorney General for Northern Ireland – Abortion Services (Safe Access Zones) (Northern Ireland) Bill [2022] UKSC 32. [read post]
11 Oct 2007, 6:55 pm
This trend--a steady shrinking of the judicial role in public policy and a handing over of issues to the states--is consistent with Roberts' conservative philosophy. [read post]
27 Nov 2007, 11:07 am
Ag Supply v. [read post]
27 Apr 2016, 9:03 pm
In State v. [read post]
6 Feb 2007, 6:38 pm
United States v. [read post]
28 Jan 2010, 9:43 am
Mullins v. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 8:03 am
As stated earlier, the inability to define a mutually agreeable protocol is a key issue that has plagued the court and the parties for months in Da Silva Moore, et. al. v. [read post]
