Search for: "State v. L. B."
Results 4801 - 4820
of 6,572
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jun 2013, 8:31 am
Introduction What is the proper scope of state power and its agent the public lawyer in Criminal law? [read post]
16 Aug 2008, 2:43 am
– discussion of Washington Post article on Ismed’s efforts to promote follow-on biologics approval pathway: (Patent Baristas), (Patent Docs), US: Congressional fact-finding on follow-on biologics: (Patent Docs), US: David v Monsanto: Biotechnology patent ‘exhaustion’ after Quanta, Supreme Court petition: (Hal Wegner), US: Ulysses Pharmaceuticals announces issuance of patent for novel class of ant [read post]
23 Apr 2007, 2:00 am
S 2811
BLURB : CP L. secnd chance program
First Act: 02/12/07 referred to codes
Last Act: 04/16/07 REFERRED TO CODES
S947B MAZIARZ -- Relates to the crimes of criminal possession of stolen property in the third degree and grand larceny in the third degree
No Same as
BLURB : Pen L. crmnl possesn & grnd lrcny
First Act: 01/12/07 REFERRED TO CODES
Last Act: 04/16/07 AMENDED ON THIRD READING… [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 3:07 pm
Indeed, Eugene V. [read post]
24 Dec 2008, 1:43 pm
Roosevelt UFSD; grants Chapter Signed Date Effective Date 9 01/28/2008 01/28/2008 Last Act: 01/28/08 SIGNED CHAP.9 10 S6773 ROBACH -- Relates to compensation benefits and other terms and conditions of employment of certain state officers state officers and employees; repealer;appropriation BLURB : Civ Serv. comp benefits Chapter Signed Date Effective Date 10 01/28/2008 provided that the applicable effective date for Parts A through B shall be as specifically… [read post]
17 Dec 2015, 1:07 pm
V, § 3(b)(10), Fla. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 10:33 am
Ct., Queens Co., decided 6/8/2009) Plaintiff alleged that he sustained personal injuries when his car was struck in the rear by the car owned by the defendant rental car company, Elrac Inc., and driven by the defendant Jermaine L. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 9:00 am
There must have been an awful lot of evidence to read, because it wasn't until January 2010 that the Opposition Division dismissed the Article 8(1)(b) opposition since there was no likelihood of confusion. [read post]
19 Apr 2017, 8:55 pm
Robert L. [read post]
8 Dec 2006, 1:00 pm
The Court distinguished United States v. [read post]
11 Apr 2016, 6:25 am
(b).) [read post]
8 Nov 2017, 7:40 am
Co. v. [read post]
1 Oct 2012, 11:54 pm
Sivarama Krishnan (1995) Cri L J 1384 (Ker). [read post]
24 Jul 2021, 11:51 am
Comment b to Section 433A circuitously and vacuously defines “distinct harms” as those “results which, by their nature, are more capable of apportionment. [read post]
5 Feb 2018, 9:34 am
His conviction was affirmed last month in State v. [read post]
23 Jul 2013, 7:07 am
In the district court, defendant AHRN moved to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a claim, arguing that plaintiff MRIS did not own the copyrights in the photographs sued upon since the assignments between it and its subscribers were not memorialized in a signed writing as mandated by Section 204(a). [read post]
29 May 2019, 9:01 pm
L. [read post]
22 Oct 2009, 4:23 am
Indiana State Police, 541 F.3d 760, 763 (7th Cir. 2008) (Twombly inapplicable to affirmative defenses).In Dittman v. [read post]
25 Jun 2022, 12:37 pm
” State v. [read post]
10 Dec 2019, 7:01 am
(R.) v. [read post]
